Zionism - The Root Cause of the Wars in the Middle East
November 1, 2016
The Palestinian refugee population of the Yarmouk Camp near Damascus, Syria, was targeted by the U.S.-armed militia known as ISIS. Allowing the displaced Palestinians to return to their homeland is the key issue that needs to be solved in order to bring peace to the Middle East. The wars that are being waged across the Middle East are caused by the Zionist maximalists who refuse to accept that the Palestinian problem has to be solved with justice for the Palestinian people.
The world is in turmoil. People live in fear of nuclear war like they did during the worst days of the Cold War. Europe is flooded with refugees and wars of terrorism rage across the Middle East. People wonder if there is something they can do to alleviate the strife and turmoil that afflicts our world today – and lessen the chances of a nuclear war.
The good news is, yes, there is in fact something everyone can do – once we understand the real source of the wars and conflicts our nations are engaged in.
The people of America and Europe are greatly disturbed and generally confused by the wars and turmoil raging in the Middle East, Ukraine, and Africa. One of the most obvious consequences of the wars in the Middle East is the massive flow of refugees and migrants coming into Europe, a flow of desperate humans coming in numbers that have not been seen since the Second World War.
The flood of refugees coming into Europe was created by the illegal wars of aggression being waged in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.
As NATO aggressively sends military forces and missiles to the states that border Russia, the controlled media wages a blatant fear-mongering campaign against the people of Scandinavia and Eastern Europe scaring them with propaganda stories that threaten the population with the idea of a Russian invasion.
The Jewish-owned (Bonniers AB) Expressen tabloid wages psychological warfare against the Swedish population, pushing anti-Russian propaganda on a daily basis.
This issue claims that Russia has plans to release nuclear weapons over Sweden.
What is peculiar about the nations that feel most threatened by a Russian invasion is that they themselves are proud members of the U.S.-led coalition that illegally invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya during the fifteen-year-old War on Terror. The fact that these invasions, like the U.S. intervention in Syria, fall into the category of illegal wars of aggression is never discussed in the controlled media that promotes the fear of a Russian invasion.
Sweden, for example, just announced that it would double its military forces fighting in the Kurdish part of northern Iraq, where the Rothschild family owns the largest oil company. Why is Sweden, who has a long history of neutrality, engaged in an illegal war of aggression in Iraq?
The Americans and Europeans are confused and perplexed about these matters because the controlled media does not give them the information or analysis they need to make sense of the wars their nations are engaged in.
A good example comes from a current news story from Reuters about Syria, and Russia’s military support for the Syrian government:
Russia backs Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Syria's civil war, and its military operation in Syria, now in its second year, has shored up Assad's position. That has put Moscow on a collision course with Washington and its allies who want Assad removed from office.
– “Russia says resumption of Syria peace talks delayed indefinitely,” Reuters, November 1, 2016
– “Russia says resumption of Syria peace talks delayed indefinitely,” Reuters, November 1, 2016
So, Reuters tells us that Moscow is “on a collision course with Washington and its allies who want Assad removed from office,” but gives no explanation why Washington wants Assad removed from power. The Western reader is left to assume that removing the Syrian leader from power must be a good thing and that there must be good reasons to do so, because, of course, Washington and its allies would only want something that is good. Furthermore, removing Assad from power must be worth risking war with Russia otherwise why would the U.S. pursue a policy that carries such risks?
There is, however, nothing good at all about the U.S.-led effort to overthrow the government of Syria. The reality is that the war that has devastated much of Syria during the past five years is not a true civil war at all, but is in fact an illegal war being waged by armies of mercenary terrorists who have been funded and trained by the U.S. (C.I.A.) and some of its allies in the region on behalf of the Israelis, who are the real masterminds behind the War on Terror and the U.S.-led invasions of Iraq and Syria.
A screen shot from a video showing a long convoy of ISIS fighters coming into Syria from Iraq - with a U.S. Apache helicopter bringing up the rear.
"US Apache helicopter escorts ISIS convoy into Syria"
Video URL: youtu.be/X7LerTUhxxI
Americans have been led to believe that the U.S. is trying to overthrow the elected leader of Syria because he is waging war on his own people, which is simply not true. The Syrian government is waging war against armies of foreign terrorists who are funded and trained by the U.S. government, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, with help from Jordan, Turkey, Israel, and some European allies. These foreign-funded terrorists base themselves in civilian areas, like Eastern Aleppo, and then use the civilian population as human shields.
There are numerous reports documenting the use of the civilian population of Eastern Aleppo as human shields by the terrorist groups supported by the U.S. administration.
There is, however, no valid U.S. national interest to justify President Obama’s war against the government of Syria. The U.S. has spent more than one billion dollars per year since 2011 to wage war against the government of Syria because it is in Israel’s interest, not ours.
As then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in 2012, the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government. Her email clearly reveals that as Secretary of State, Clinton was working to oust the Syrian government because it was in Israel’s interests — not America’s.
A leaked Clinton email from 2012 reveals that the U.S.-led war in Syria is being waged because it is "the best way to help Israel."
Likewise, a simple diagnosis of all of the wars currently being waged by the United States in the Middle East reveals that they are all part of an Israeli strategy known as the Yinon Plan to dominate the region by Balkanizing the large Arab states and breaking them up along ethnic and religious fault-lines. This is what has been done in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, and Sudan, and what is currently being done in Syria.
The Israeli plan to dominate the Middle East by breaking up the Arab states into ethnic statelets is known as the Yinon Plan (1982).
A diagnosis to identify the real cause of the wars in the Middle East reveals that the Zionist plan to dominate the region is behind the U.S.-led wars that have been waged in the region since the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
As my research into the false-flag attacks of 9/11 shows, Israeli military intelligence and Zionist agents were behind the attacks and cover-up, as well as the false narrative that was used to take the United States to war. The 9/11 attacks were, in fact, a well-planned and sophisticated false-flag operation that was designed to kick-start the Global War on Terror, an Israeli war agenda that was rolled out onto the world stage at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in July 1979 – at the Jonathan (Netanyahu) Institute.
The purpose of the Jerusalem Conference was to start a global propaganda “offensive” to blame the Soviet Union for “training, funding, and equipping” international terrorism. The masterminds of this offensive were the Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, the “Father of Terrorism,” and the heads of Israeli military intelligence.
Menachem Begin, the founder of the Likud Party that currently rules Israel, considered himself to be "The Father of Terrorism" - in all of the world.
For Begin and his military intelligence planners it was “most important” to “maintain anti-Soviet hostility in Washington” because this tension between the super-powers prevented a settlement from being imposed on Israel and the Palestinians, “a development the Begin administration wished to avoid at all costs.”
Menachem Begin’s right-wing political party of Jewish terrorists (Likud) is still in power today, as it has been for most of the past four decades, and Israeli military intelligence is still using the same anti-Russia strategy to prevent a super-power settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The fact that Victoria Nuland (Mrs. Robert Kagan), the Asst. Secretary of State for Eurasia, played a key role in organizing and funding the coup d’état that overthrew the elected government in Ukraine is a key point to understand the anti-Russian posture being assumed by the U.S. government and its allies.
Asst. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland played a key role in fomenting the violent overthrow of the Ukrainian government.
Nuland then chose Arseniy Yatsenyuk, an anti-Russian politician, to be the next prime minister. This was a choice that was certain to cause civil strife in a nation with a large Russian minority population. Crimea, for example, is more than 90 percent Russian-speaking.
Victoria Nuland is also a Zionist of the most extreme kind. This is not merely a coincidence.
Victoria Nuland (Kagan) is a member of the Zionist Neo-Con family that brought us the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the war against Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The Kagan family, along with the rest of the Zionist Neo-Cons, is at the center of the anti-Russian policy being pursued by the United States and its European allies. As with Syria, there is absolutely no valid U.S. national interest in having hostile relations with Russia. It is rather in the best interest of the United States and the European nations to have friendly relations with Russia.
So, when we diagnose the most serious political problems afflicting the Western world today we find that these problems are all caused by the Zionist state of Israel and its allies and supporters in the United States and Europe. The mainstream media won’t tell you that but that is what we find when an honest diagnosis of these problems is done.
When we understand that Zionism and the State of Israel is behind:
- the false-flag terrorism of 9/11, the cover-up, and the fraudulent War on Terror;
- the miserable plight of millions of Palestinian refugees;
- the wars of terrorism in the Middle East (e.g. Syria, Iraq), and;
- the rabid anti-Russia politics and fear-mongering...
then the real cause of these problems is understood and the solution becomes quite clear.
While our politicians are forced to support the Zionist state, we are not. Anyone who understands that the Likud party of Jewish terrorists and the intransigent policies of the State of Israel are causing these problems, and still supports Israel - is clearly part of the problem.
Understanding that the Zionist State of Israel is the cause of the wars being waged across the Middle East enables us to see through the disinformation being provided by our governments and the controlled media. Only with a clear understanding of the root cause of these wars will the public be able to create a popular movement to take the political actions required to rectify these problems which are becoming more urgent every day.
This bumper sticker is made by Henry Herskovitz who has maintained a vigil in front of his former synagogue, Beth Israel, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for more than a decade, to raise Jewish awareness of the grave injustice the Zionist state of Israel represents and its corruption of Jewish values in America.
The world needs more righteous Jews like Henry Herskovitz of Ann Arbor.
Who is behind Hillary Clinton’s Hostility for Russia and Why it Matters
October 27, 2016
The Jerusalem conference (Netanyahu Institute, 1979) also helped to revive the anti-Soviet alliance between Israel and the United States by charging the Soviets with responsibility for "funding, training, and equipping international terrorism." This new charge helped keep the United States and the Soviet Union at each other's throats, thus preventing them from agreeing on a diplomatic solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict in the Middle East.
- "International Terrorism": The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, 1982
- "International Terrorism": The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, 1982
Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk camp near Damascus, Syria, have been victims of the U.S.-led war of terror imposed on Syria since 2011.
Criminality Exposed - Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in 2012 that "the best way to help Israel" is to "use force" to overthrow the government in Syria. What nation was she working for, anyway?
Concerning matters of war and peace, the relationship between the United States and Russia is certainly the most important foreign policy issue facing American voters in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. Because the two leading presidential candidates have such different positions on Russia, the outcome of the U.S. election will have profound consequences for the entire world.
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, is openly hostile to Russia and advocates reckless policies, such as no-fly zones over Syria, which could lead to a military conflict between the two super-powers.
Donald Trump, the Republican, on the other hand, offers a much more common-sense and friendly approach to Russia. Compared to Clinton, Trump’s positive posture vis-à-vis Russia is certainly one of the most important reasons why Americans concerned about world peace will cast their votes for him.
The last thing Americans need or want is hostility with Russia, so why is Hillary Clinton fomenting the one thing that nobody wants? And, why is the controlled media in the United States supporting Clinton and the reckless anti-Russian policies she advocates?
The answer is fairly obvious: Clinton is advocating anti-Russian policies because that is what she has been told to do by the people who control her, which would seem to be the same people who control the media.
There are two things about Russia that the controlled media in the United States constantly misrepresent to the American public: the Russian annexation of the Crimea and the Russian intervention in Syria.
The controlled media portrays the Russian annexation of the Crimean peninsula as illegal and aggression, while it clearly is neither. The media, in fact, turns the matter completely around. What happened in the Ukraine is that the U.S. State Department, under the leadership of Asst. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (Mrs. Robert Kagan) financed and arranged the violent coup d’état that overthrew the elected government in Kiev, in effect stealing the whole nation of Ukraine. This is the crime that changed Ukraine from being an ally of Russia to becoming a client state of the U.S.
The population of Crimea, which is overwhelmingly Russian-speaking, voted not to join the U.S.-installed government in Kiev and chose to re-join Russia. This was a given that could have easily been predicted. To say that this was aggression on the part of Russia is absolutely false, but that remains the core lie about Russia the controlled media repeats constantly.
The situation is the same with the Russian intervention in Syria. The Russians were asked by the legal and elected government of Syria to assist in the struggle to put down the terrorist “rebels” that have been armed, trained, and funded by the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, and Israel since 2011.
The legal situation in Syria is actually very simple: the Russian intervention in Syria is legal; the U.S. intervention is not. In Syria, the U.S. and its allies are blatantly violating international law and committing war crimes on a daily basis. U.S. taxpayer dollars are funding the terrorist extremists seeking to overthrow the democratically elected leader, Bashar al Assad.
Hillary Clinton was U.S. Secretary of State from January 2009 until February 2013. Victoria Nuland (Kagan) was Clinton’s spokesperson at the State Department from May 2011 through the remainder of Clinton’s term in office. This means that Clinton and Nuland-Kagan saw eye-to-eye and were reading from the same script regarding U.S. foreign policy.
Victoria Nuland is the wife of Robert Kagan, one of the founders of The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), the Zionist and Neo-Con organization that lobbied for the war in Yugoslavia and the invasion of Iraq. The Kagans have been a driving force for criminal military interventions since the 1990s and seem to have a permanent family fiefdom at the State Department.
As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton supported the illegal U.S. involvement in Syria, writing that “the best way to help Israel” is to use force to overthrow the elected government in Damascus. Since 2011, the Obama administration has authorized and funded the C.I.A. to work to that end in Syria.
The Russian intervention in Syria threatens to bring to an end the U.S.-led criminal terrorist activity in Syria and leave the coalition of the killing exposed for the criminals that they are. This is the only reason the conflict in Syria drags on and on. The Obama administration and its allies cannot accept defeat in Syria because it would result in the tables in the Middle East being turned completely around against them.
But, why are the Zionist Neo-Cons and the Clinton gang stirring up fear and hostility against Russia?
To understand why Clinton is so hostile to Russia it is worth recalling the U.S. election in 1980 in which Ronald Reagan was elected. During his first press conference in January 1981, Alexander Haig, the new Secretary of State, announced a new focus for U.S. foreign policy, saying “international terrorism will take the place of human rights” and went on to blame the Soviet Union for “training, funding, and equipping” international terrorism.
Haig’s charges against the Soviet Union were very serious, just as Clinton’s are against Russia, but in both cases they are utterly spurious and false. So, why did such high-level officials make such allegations in the first place?
The Reagan administration was profoundly influenced by Claire Sterling’s 1981 book The Terror Network: The Secret of International Terrorism, which was often cited by Haig and others to support the administration’s charges about Soviet support for international terrorism.
Philip Paull, author of the thesis “International Terrorism: The Propaganda War” (1982) analyzed Sterling’s sources and references in her book and found “a trail of deception and misinformation was laid bare.”
Paull found that Sterling’s misquotes were “exact replicas of the misquotes published by the Jonathan (Netanyahu) Institute" in conjunction with the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism arranged by Menachem Begin, Benjamin Netanyahu and his father Benzion, and the chiefs of Israeli military intelligence in July 1979.
“There, a coalition had been organized, and a consensus achieved, that would put international terrorism at the top of the Reagan administration’s foreign policy agenda when it assumed office in January 1981,” Paull wrote, adding, “It appeared that Washington’s concern about Soviet support for international terrorism in the winter of 1981 had been created in Jerusalem in the summer of 1979.”
Paull’s thesis proves “that the heightened global media coverage of ‘international terrorism’ during 1980-81 was for the most part a result of a deliberate, well-financed, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli government, and carried out by its overseas allies.”
“This ‘anti-terrorist’ propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime ‘psychological warfare’ by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem,” Paull found.
Paull explains why Menachem Begin and his faction of Zionist terrorists in the Likud coalition needed to connect the Soviet Union to international terrorism:
The Jackson group (Sen. Henry M. Jackson), virtually an Israeli lobby in the United States, used the Israelis to support the anti-Soviet campaign in Washington…
The Israeli conference organizers, in turn, could use Jackson and the Commentary group around Podhoretz to help prevent a pro-Arab tilt in Washington, keep United States armaments flowing to Israel, and most important, maintain anti-Soviet hostility in Washington. Relaxation of superpower hostility could trigger a thaw in U.S.-Soviet relations, and a settlement in the Middle East which would include the Palestinians would then be conceivable. This was a development the Begin administration wished to avoid at all costs.
So, Menachem Begin and the Likud party of Zionist terrorists were behind the propaganda offensive launched in Jerusalem in 1979 at the Netanyahu Institute to smear the Palestinians as terrorists and the Soviet Union as being behind 'international terrorism'. This message became the new political theme and was vigorously pushed in controlled media outlets around the world.
As Claire Sterling wrote in “Terrorism: Tracing the Network,” published in the New York Times Magazine in March 1981:
There is massive proof that the Soviet Union and its surrogates over the last decade, have provided the weapons, training and sanctuary for a worldwide terror network aimed at destabilization of Western democratic society.
As Paull proves in his thesis about the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, Sterling’s false claims “rested on a body of misinformation originating in Jerusalem.”
Today, thirty-seven years later, we are facing the same misinformation campaign and the same game of blaming Russia in order to create hostility and tension between the world’s leading super-powers. It is essential to understand that this propaganda comes from the same source now as it came from then – Israeli military intelligence under the political leadership of the Likud faction, now headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.
It is important for U.S. voters to understand that the anti-Russian rhetoric coming from Hillary Clinton and the controlled media is extremely dangerous and harmful to the cause of peace. It is in the best interest of the United States (and Europe) to have positive and friendly relations with Russia and there is no reason why we should not enjoy peaceful relations.
The criminals behind the anti-Russian policies and rhetoric are the real terrorists who seek to overthrow nations around the world, enslave their people, and steal their wealth. They have done so with Hillary Clinton in power leading the way in places like Iraq, Libya, and Syria – and seek to do the same to Russia. Her record in these interventions is clear - she has been involved in war crimes at the highest level.
By preventing peaceful relations between Russia and the West and by fomenting tension between the super-powers, the criminal lunatics behind Hillary Clinton seek to increase their control over Palestine and the Middle East by keeping the world in a constant state of fear and violence. This is why Hillary Clinton poses such a serious threat to world peace.
Source: "International Terrorism": The Propaganda War, Philip Paull, Thesis for M.A. International Relations, San Francisco State Univ., May 1982
Post a Comment