Friday, March 24, 2017

.911,U.S.,UK,France,Western Governments Collude In False Flag Terrorism Against Own Citizens

911,U.S.,UK,France,Western Governments Collude In False Flag Terrorism Against Own Citizens

England swings like a pendelum do
bobbies on bicycles tw by two
west minster abby the tower of big bin
the bloody red faces of the government terrorized children

Note that family of allwged dead 'Islamic' terrorist  seems to live VERY well even though the mother was a 17 year old when ahe gave birth and statistically VERY unlikely to be able to afford to live in or own 300,000 pond homes in the UK.......ALSO BORN CHRISTIAN BUT CONVERTED TO ISLAM, ETC. AND CONNECTED TO BRITISH MILITARY................

On 14th November 2015, Trevor Brooks, and a friend, acted in breach of their probation by travelling abroad without telling anyone.   The friend's brother is a British Army member, while his father is British RAF....................No doubt that the Jewish Zionist City of London and ex PM Tony Blair or 'Tony B Liar' worked hand in hand with W Bush,DICK CHENEY,ISRAEL, ET.AL.
TO PULL OFF 911.Cheney has colluded with and done business with the Rothchild crime family.... 

Rothschild's Netanyahu Threatened French Parliament: Prior To ...
14 ene. 2015 - Palestinians and Israelis react to French vote recognizing Palestine. ... 15 Signs The Charlie Hebdo Attack Was A False Flag ... They still want us to believe that al-Qaeda did 9/11 even though that fairy tale has .... Independence From British Puritans · Kennedy Murdered · Magna Carta · Nullification By 10th.
13 ene. 2015 - Madame Rothschild — “I Know who was behind the Paris Attacks! ... private email that the Charlie Hebdo affair was a Mossad operation. ... email sometimes in March when I return to France and the UK from ... Mossadorchestrated false flag operations also took place on French soil. .... US Politics and News.
8 ene. 2015 - HOW MANY MOSSAD AGENTS does it take to pull off a false flag? ... for the murderers to flee in, reportedly “carjacked” as per the French police. ... theory that the Charlie Hebdo attack was a Mossad false flag operation. ... And: Did Israel's Mossad Do 9/11? .... Peter in the UK January 8, 2015 @ 5:01 am.

Is France's Charlie Hebdo 'Terrorism' A Rothschild-Google Joke? Do ...
14 ene. 2015 - Do White 'Jews' Control The U.S.,EU,UK,Mexico,Malaysia. ... Google has tried to delete all the videos that have exposed the Charlie Hebdo false flag. ... "conspiracy theories sweep the Internet accusing Israel of orchestrating the Charlie Hebdo attack." .... Israel's 9/11 Terrorism Denial:Christian Churches .

Friday, 24 March 2017


The 'London Attacker' at Huntley School for Boys in Tunbridge Wells in Kent.

The 'London Attacker', Adrian Elms has been described by a former friend at school as being a 'clever, normal guy' who 'liked girls and fags.'

The former friend says Adrian was 'one of the lads', who played football and rugby for their school -Huntleys School for Boys in Tunbridge Wells.

Adrian had had a tracheotomy operation at some point, leaving him with a scar on his neck.

The former friend said Adrian never showed any kind of religious zealotry, and was 'one of the clever ones'.

In his school football kit: 'London terror attacker' Adrian

The police claim that the London Attacker (above) is Adrian Elms.
52-year-old Adrian Elms was born a Christian, in Erith, near Dartford in Kent.

Adrian Elms was brought up in a £300,000 house in Rye, in East Sussex.

Adrian Elms was born to a 17-year-old single mother, Janet Elms. 

Just under two years after the birth, Janet Elms married Phillip Ajao.

Phillip Ajao currently lives in Banbury, Oxfordshire, and runs a number of florists and fabrics companies.

Janet Elms currently lives in rural west Wales in a home said to be worth half a million pounds.

dailymail. / English teacher 


Adrian Elms was jailed in 2003, and sent to Lewes jail in East Sussex.

There is a belief that Adrian Elms was mind controlled by MI5.

Adrian Elm's Birmingham neighbour Anna Goras says that Adrian Elms has a 'split personality'.

English teacher 

This can be a sign of having been mind controlled.

Above left, we see Joe Dixon of ISIS. Joe's mother' Sally Jones is from Chatham in Kent. 

In 2003, Adrian Elms was jailed.

In 2005 Adrian Elms was teaching workers at the General Authority of Civil Aviation, in Saudi Arabia.

Adrian Elms joined a college in Luton as a 'senior English teacher', supervising seven other staff.

In 2012, Adrian Elms set up his own English language tutoring business  in Birmingham.

English teacher 

Jack Letts, aka Jihadi Jack, mind controlled by the security services. KIDS CONTROLLED BY SPOOKS.

Adrian Elms has 'a body-double' called Trevor Brooks, who was originally accused of being the London attacker.
Trevor Brooks.
Adrian Elms lived for more than two years until 2013 in Luton.

A former neighbour says Elms was a 'polite, shy' and 'quite portly man', whom she often saw gardening at the front of his property and playing with his children.

Adrian Elms.


1. The main GATE into the grounds of parliament was left open and reportedly nobody was guarding the gate.
2. Multiple sources say that there were TWO assailants in the vehicle on Westminster Bridge.

A BBC reporter says a witness described the two assailants as being a 'bald white man' and another man.
London Attack .

3. There was a practice DRILL in London on 19th March 2017.

4.  The CCTV cameras for Westminster were reported to have been taken off-line.

London Attack .

4. The man originally alleged to be the main attacker, Trevor Brooks, has links to MI6.

5. The UK Prime Minister has said that Adrian Elms was known to the police and intelligence services.

Adrian Elms is also known as Khalid Masood.

(Updates further down the page)
On 22 March 2017, "a terror attacker brought carnage to central London."

The attack comes a year to the day after the 22 March 2016 terrorist attack in Brussels.


On 19 March 2017, there was a terror drill in London.

"Hundreds of armed police in speedboats zoomed down the river Thames today as part of major anti-terrorist drill in London."

The drill involved specialist officers clad in black uniforms and toting machine guns, the London Ambulance Service, London Fire Brigade and the RNLI.

On 22 March 2017, more than 12 people are said to have been hit by a vehicle on Westmister Bridge after a 4x4 drove into pedestrians and cyclists before crashing into the gates of Parliament.

The alleged Asian attacker.

"An intruder, described by a witness as 'middle-aged and Asian', then managed to break into the grounds of the Parliament and stabbed a police officer before he was shot."


Westminster Bridge is close to the HQ of MI6.

Terror drill in London 19 March 2017.

On 19th March 2017, the terror drill in London involved the River Thames.

On 22 March 2017, a woman was pulled from the River Thames alive after the attack on Westminster bridge near Britain's parliament.

Woman pulled alive from River Thames after London attack
The French prime minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, confirmed that a group of French students from Concarneau were among those injured in the 22 March 2017 London attack.[9][16]
The students were said to be aged 15-16.[9]

The acting Metropolitan Police Service commissioner Craig Mackey was a witness to the London Attack on 22 March 2017.

There was more than one attacker.
"The BBC understands from multiple sources that two assailants were in the vehicle on Westminster Bridge," BBC correspondent Dominic Casciani said on Twitter.

Police still seeking one assailant in London attack: report.

'The dead attacker', 22 March 2017.
The 'dead' attacker in the 22 March 2017 attack in London was said to be Trevor Brooks, from Hackney in London.

Trevor Brooks, who is supposed to be still in jail.

British-born Trevor Brooks calls himself Abu Izzadeen.

Trevor Brooks supports ISIS, which is said to be run by the CIA and its friends.

A producer working for the US news network ABC said she had spoken to Izzadeen's solicitor, who "confirms to me that he is still in jail and could not have been the attacker".

Abu Izzadeen: London attack suspect 'named'

The attack vehicle above. "The BBC understands from multiple sources that there were two assailants in the vehicle on Westminster Bridge," BBC correspondent Dominic Casciani said on Twitter. Police still seeking one assailant in London attack: report.
Some reports from media outlets accused Abu Izzadeen, born Trevor Brooks, as being the 'dead' attacker.

Anonymous comments:

On 14th November 2015, Trevor Brooks, and a friend, acted in breach of their probation by travelling abroad without telling anyone. 

The friend's brother is a British Army member, while his father is British RAF.

Trevor Brooks was born a Christian, in Hackney.

He!He! Makes you wonder where these 'terrorists' come from. We have two 'Muslim' terrorists, who have no doubt been in several meetings with their controllers, discussing this attack, it has all been planned down to the last detail, the 'terrorists' supposedly travel from Essex to Westminster - right on the doorstep of Parliament. The great plan is to crash their car into a number of unknown pedestrians, passenger runs off and disappears into thin air while the other jumps out of the car and run into Parliament brandishing a knife and killing a 'policeman' on duty?? A school kid could devise a better plan! Anyone have footage of the crashed car, by the way? Meanwhile, the West continues to bomb Syria killing a number of civilians!

Look how similar the 22/3/2017 London Westminster Bridge Car Attack and the 20/1/2017 Melbourne Bourke Street Car Attack is where both occured near popular tourist attractions i.e.: Wesminster Bridge where the famous Big Ben is and Bourke Street where the famous Bourke Street Mall is; both instigated by a car abiet one is with a SUV and another with a sedan; both cars are registered within country of origin abiet one is in England and another is in Australia; both Police is located within the vicinity and did nothing to stop the suspicious, abnormal driving; both the instigator got shot abiet one got killed and another injured; both occured in the afternoon peak local time abiet one is at 2:30pm GMT and another at 1:30pm AEDT; both there are innocent victims either died or injured abiet one is 5 dead and 40 injured and another is 6 dead and 36 injured; both are vehicular attacks; both have stabbings abiet one is a police officer another is the instigator's brother but at the instigator's home; both there are arrests made abiet one is the partner's in crime and the other is the instigator.,_Melbourne

    1. The current UK National Security Strategy was adopted in March 2008. One of the architects was Sir Da vid Ormand, who had been the UK Security and Intelligence Coordina tor in the Cabinet Office (and previously been Director of Government Communications Headquarters, GCHQ, the UK equiva lent of the US’s NSA). In a publication for the Institue for Publ ic Policy Research (IPPR) Ormand says that the implications of the Strategy for the intelligence community include the adoption of anticipatory policies towards future threats.[3]

      He uses the example of local proble ms being tackled at the local level at the same time as national auth orities take on the international dimensions: “The national intelligence authoritie s will be expected to both ensure that the local enforcement level - in cluding police, border forces and other local authorities - have the necessary information, and to help manage the international dimension of these domestic threats.” 4 This is a description of the vertical , “top-bottom”, aspect of internal security. “Anticipatory policies” are intend ed to “allow disruption” of the threat, to pre-empt them by “authorising covert actions” where “governments cannot afford to be seen to be directly involved”. To use these tactics to “disrupt” the activi ties of known terrorists or drug dealers is one thing. But if these sa me practices are extended to those who have “come to their notice” or fr iends of these people or to those who have radical views or are organi sing a demonstration on what is perceived to be a sensitive issues it is another ma tter altogether. In the article Ormand says that mo dern national security needs three types of intelligence: traditional se cret sources, open sources and an entirely new one: “personal protected data”. Traditional secret sources: the “heart” of secret intelligence is human sources (HUMINT, undercover agents and paid/unpaid pa rticipants) and the interception of co mmunications. These are backed by SIGINT (Signals intelligence), IMINT (photo-reconnaissance), ELINT (electronic intelligence) and MASINT(measureme nt and signature intelligence). However, these secret sources are increasingly ”dwarfed” by OSINT(Open source intelligence) trawled from the internet. The new third category is PROT INT(“protected information”). “This is personal information ab out individuals that resides in databases, such as advance passen ger information, airline bookings and other travel data, passport an d biometric data, immigration, identity and border records, criminal records, and other governmental and private sector data, including financial and telephone and other communications records. Such information may be held in national records, covere d by Data Protection legislation, but it might also be held offshore by other nations or by global companies, and may or may not be subject to international agreements.
    2. they turned off the cctv in westminster last year not enough money
    3. There was no blood On The Knife
    4. CCTV off?
  1. Spring, new season, new hoax, it was about time after a while of peace, more or less
  2. How convienient for French students to be among the injured. I guess Le Pen's a shoe-in then.
  3. If feel sorry for the people of the west. Every time there's something like this on the news, journalists try to make a drama out of useless parked cars and non-existent crisis.

    I feel really sad for such low-level reporting. I do not blame the police - yet they run these theatrical live actions - I point the finger at the journalists first, then at the people gobbling everything down their throat either from tv, the web or radio.

    What's the news here? I see the bridge is closed to the traffic and nothing more. In late news the obligatory GOD IS GREAT will be repeated all over the CIA//MOSSAD porpaganda fronts.
  4. 'Acting Met Commissioner witnessed the incident'
  5. Witnesses of my ass
  6. 'A Stick'

    "He (the assailant) ran in through the open gates... He set about one of the policemen with what looked like a stick"
  7. Jim Stone is rite this time again:

    "Was the attack on UK parlaiment a hoax?

    It has all the makings of a hoax. Foreigner (albeit an "asian" man, maybe tie in to North Korea?) totally innocent bystanders intentionally mowed down by SUV, which then turned onto government property by crashing the gate at the house of commons where a guard was stabbed to death by the driver. "perpetrator" shot. Sounds like a typical FF. How could you get out of an SUV and approach a guard with a knife without getting shot FIRST after crashing a gate in a place like that? I don't think they are quite that patient. Not sure what to think yet, but I am skeptical to say the least. see this and that reminds me - it is interesting that the police "mysteriously found evidence of vote fraud" that could nullify Brexit just as it was about to be ratified . . . . . yep, all believable. Just like this "Asian suicide driver"."


    1. "Asian" is a term used in the U.K. To describe people from the Indian sub-continent not Korea.

      The car did NOT crash through the gates. He entered on foot. The gate in question was open to allow vehicle access for government ministers arriving at parliament for a vote. The police officer killed was unarmed. He was shot by a secondary officer very promptly.

      The voter fraud you reference relates to the breaches in laws for how much political parties can spend on campaigner during the last general election, not the Brexit referendum.

Israeli False Flags and the Attack on Rev. Stephen Sizer

Israeli False Flags and the Attack on Rev. Stephen Sizer
By Brandon Martinez
The counterfeit hoopla surrounding the Charlie Hebdo ‘free speech’ saga was further undermined this week when a prominent British vicar posted an article on Facebook linking Israel to the 9/11 attacks, for which he is now ‘under investigation.’
Stephen Sizer, a well-known reverend of Christ Church, Virginia Water, posted the Wikispooks article “9/11: Israel Did It” on Facebook and subsequently asked, “Is this [research] anti-Semitic?”
“It raises so many questions,” he added.

Rev. Stephen Sizer is an outspoken critic of Christian Zionism.
Sizer eventually removed the post under mounting pressure from his Diocese and Britain’s Jewish lobby, but affirmed his right to freedom of speech and inquiry.
“It is essential the public become convinced of what happened before and after 9/11,” Sizer told Jewish News Online. “Inevitably the truth will upset many people if it is shown by further investigation that the official explanations are shown to be deficient.” Suppressing discussion of Israel’s role in 9/11 will only “fuel suspicion,” the outspoken preacher stressed.
Sizer is barking up the right tree, hence the frenzied reaction from Zionists and those under their sway.
Mainstream outlets such as the BBC, The Telegraph, The Daily Mirror as well as a number of overt Zionist sources piled on the principled man of god by running identical smear stories about this manufactured ‘scandal.’ The articles in question emphasize that Sizer is ‘being investigated’ for the posting, as if it is a crime to promote an article that calls attention to Israeli false flag terrorism. The hit-pieces also prominently quote a spokesman from the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a thuggish Zionist hate-gang who have attacked Sizer as an ‘anti-Semite’ on numerous occasions. But none of the articles or the Israeli fifth columnists they champion addresses the evidence of Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
Israel’s fingerprints do indeed appear to be all over the events of 9/11. And judging by the Zionist state’s past behaviour, it should not come as a surprise to learn that 9/11 was in some way organized by Israel’s secret agencies who have on plenty of previous occasions executed false flag attacks aimed at framing their Arab/Muslim adversaries, thereby inducing adverse reactions towards their foes from the West.
A History of Deception
At the time, Israel’s founding fathers were some of the most brutal terrorists around. Two former Israeli prime ministers, Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin, were leaders of Jewish terrorist militias which waged a merciless insurgency against the indigenous Arabs of Palestine as well as the British colonial administrators of the land in the 1940s. Benjamin Netanyahu’s father, Benzion Netanyahu, was the personal secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the brains behind the bellicose ‘Revisionist’ fold within the Zionist movement which formulated the ideological framework of the Zionist militant groups who eventually besieged Palestine, destroying more than 500 Arab villages and driving out a minimum of 750,000 Palestinians in a matter of two years, from 1946 to 1948.
In 1946, two years before Israel became a state, Irgun assailants carried out an attack on the King David Hotel which housed Britain’s administrative headquarters in the Mandate of Palestine. Jewish militants under the direction of Begin disguised themselves as Arabs and planted a number of bombs hidden in milk crates in the hotel’s basement, then detonated them causing a huge explosion which leveled a good chunk of the building. Ninety-one people were killed in the blast, including dozens of British personnel. “I’m glad to have been a terrorist for liberation,” said one Jewish Irgunist in a BBC documentary about the bombing. “We didn’t mind being called terrorists then,” another former Irgun militant confessed.
A competing Zionist terrorist faction, the Stern Gang (also known as Lehi), assassinated British soldiers as well as multiple foreign diplomats and mediators such as Sweden’s Count Folke Bernadotte. That group, originally headed by the Jewish supremacist Avraham Stern, even proposed a military alliance with Nazi Germany in 1941, viewing Britain as a greater roadblock to a Jewish ethno-state in Palestine than Hitler’s regime which was quite happy to expedite the re-settlement of Germany’s Jews to the Middle East.
Fast-forward to 1954 – Israel again initiates a false flag conspiracy in the region, this time in Egypt. A terrorist cell of Zionist mercenaries was discovered in Cairo and Alexandria after they tried and failed to detonate incendiary devices in British and American installations. The Israeli operatives were discovered after one of the conspirators prematurely discharged an incendiary device in his pocket, leading to his arrest and the capture of the whole cabal. The Israeli terrorists later confessed to Egyptian authorities that the provocation was planned, organized and directed by Tel Aviv. The operation was intended to stymie a burgeoning British-American-Egyptian rapport and derail ongoing negotiations between Egypt and Britain which would have seen the British relinquish control of the Suez Canal, much to Israel’s displeasure. It was later dubbed the “Lavon Affair.”
Analyst Richard H. Curtiss, writing in a 1992 article for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, observed that Israel had in the works an identical subterfuge against Jordan the same year, wherein Israeli intelligence “conceived a plan to attack British personnel seconded to King Hussein’s government in Jordan.” “The purpose,” Curtiss explained, “was to sour relations between Britain and Jordan [as well as turn] both Jordan and Britain [against] Egypt, which would be blamed for such attacks.” Curtiss cited a 1979 book, The Untold History of Israel, by Israeli journalists Jacques Derogy and Hesi Carmel which related the story.
The Lavon Affair was not the first, nor would it be the last Israeli covert operation aimed at framing Arabs for terrorism against the West. In 1967, during the Six Day War between Israel and several Arab states, the Israeli military attacked an American surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters. Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats besieged the vessel for hours, even shooting holes in the large American flag billowing in the wind. Having scoped out the ship hours beforehand, the Israelis were well aware it was American. As a result of Israel’s heinous attack, more than 200 American sailors were dead or wounded. The motive of the blitz was to sink the Liberty, thereby preventing it from relaying messages back to Washington which could have scuttled Israeli plans to seize land from Egypt and Syria during the six-day conflict. If the ship had been successfully destroyed, Israel would have most likely attributed the attack to its Arab foes. The Israelis later captured the Sinai and Golan Heights from Egypt and Syria respectively. Unfortunately for the Israelis, the Liberty did not sink and survivors revealed Israel’s hand behind the attack.
In his books By Way of Deception and The Other Side of Deception former Mossad katsa Victor Ostrovsky revealed a litany of Israeli covert operations. One clear example of Israeli chicanery that Ostrovsky exposed was a 1986 plot codenamed ‘Operation Trojan’ which saw Mossad agents plant a transponder device on Libyan soil that relayed false coded messages making it look like the Libyan government was coordinating terrorists from their embassies worldwide to attack American targets. Simultaneously a bomb explosion rocked a Berlin nightclub frequented by US military personnel, killing two US servicemen. The Mossad deception successfully coerced a hoodwinked US President Ronald Reagan into launching air strikes on Libya, who cited the fake ‘terrorist’ transmissions emanating from a Mossad device as proof of Libyan culpability in the nightclub attack.
The Israelis are also implicated in the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. An investigative report on the World Socialist Web Site entitled “Questions mount in Kenya, Tanzania bombings” detailed US/Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks. The article, authored by Martin McLaughlin, cites reports from ABC News and Haaretz which affirmed that Israeli intelligence elements caused US officials to ignore warnings of an imminent attack against the embassies. US intelligence officials looked to their Israeli colleagues to diagnose the reliability of various warnings of looming danger, but the Israelis insisted they weren’t serious, resulting in no precautions being taken to defend against an assault.
“Four months worth of tips and alert signals that the Nairobi embassy was facing a potential disastrous explosives attack were sent to Washington,” wrote Warren Hough in a report for the American newspaper The Spotlight. “But nothing was done to protect this poorly shielded facility because, on the standard operating procedure inaugurated in the Reagan era, the FBI had to turn to the Israelis for a definite evaluation of these early warnings.”
“Ignore them, it’s just another false alarm,” Mossad told their counterparts in the CIA. The imprudent Israeli advice, Hough explained in the aforesaid article, “was the key factor in persuading the U.S. to let its guard down, resulting in the loss of life of at least 250 victims including 11 Americans.”
Israel didn’t seem to believe its own counsel. According to researcher Ralph Schoenman, the first soldiers at the scene of the crime in Kenya and Tanzania “were special units of the Israeli armed forces and high level agents of the Mossad” who quickly “took control” of the bombed out sites.
Israel’s penchant for coercing America to let its guard down indicates a more sinister fraud at work, beyond an equally damning ‘let it happen’ scenario.
September 11: Israel’s ‘Hanukkah Miracle’ & the Neocons’ ‘New Pearl Harbour’
Exploiting and outright manipulating fissures between the West and the Arab/Muslim world has been a key component of Israeli strategy from the outset. And it is this artificial divide, fostered by years of Zionist subterfuges and political scheming, that lies at the core of the agenda of those truly responsible for the 9/11 attacks, the primordial affair which kick started the bogus ‘war on terror’ and endless American war-making in the Middle East.
In a September 2001 interview with the Pakistani newspaper Ummat, Osama bin Laden denied responsibility for the attacks, articulating that the real architects of 9/11 are “persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive.” The “civilization, nation, country, or ideology” bin Laden spoke of that prospered the most from 9/11 is undoubtedly Zionism as an ideology and Israel as a country. Israel’s pugnacious leaders made that fact abundantly clear in cavalier public statements made shortly after the disaster.
The 9/11 attacks were “good for Israel” and had the effect of “[shifting] American public opinion in our favour,” announced a jubilant Benjamin Netanyahu on two separate occasions following the attacks, as quoted in Haaretz and other Israeli papers. According to Israeli journalist Aluf Benn, Ariel Sharon and his top military-intelligence advisors had proclaimed 9/11 a ‘Hanukkah miracle’ of good fortune for Israel, “coming just as Israel was under increasing international pressure because of the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians.” The assault on the Twin Towers “placed Israel firmly on the right side of the strategic map with the U.S., and put the Arab world at a disadvantage,” Benn wrote in Haaretz. “That’s the impression left by the speeches given by Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and National Security Council chairman Maj. Gen. Uzi Dayan, at this week’s Herzliya conference on national security.”
“Since September 11, our leaders have been euphoric,” the former Israeli intelligence chief Ami Ayalon told France’s Le Monde newspaper. “With no more international pressures on Israel, they [the Israeli leadership] think, the way is open.” Ehuk Sprinzak, a founding Dean at Israel’s Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, reiterated the expressions of relief and delight amongst the Zionist leadership, telling the Israeli press that 9/11 was the “most important public relations act every committed in our favour.” On the day of 9/11, Zionist commentator and Stratfor director George Friedman expressed the view that “[t]he big winner today, intended or not, is the state of Israel” because the attacks will foster a closer alliance between the US and Israel as well as lead America into “a massive covert and overt war against” the Muslim world. Even Israel’s former Mossad chief, Efraim Halevy, told a Canadian journalist that “one of the immediate results of 9/11 was clearly a very severe backlash of international approbation of Islam in general” and that Israel “obviously benefitted” from America’s response to the atrocity.
Years before 9/11, Zionists and neocons formed a number of think tanks to promote their militarist agenda in the Middle East. The most prominent one was called Project for the New American Century (PNAC), and was headed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan, two of Israel’s staunchest supporters in the US. In a September 2000 report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” the neocons pontificated about the need for a “New Pearl Harbour” to actualize their war plans against Middle Eastern regimes, particular that of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Four years earlier, in 1996, several prominent American neocons, notably Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, authored a strategy paper for an Israeli think tank called the ‘Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000.’ In their paper titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” the cadre of pro-Israel evangelists essentially called for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, which was an “important Israeli strategic objective” from their perspective. The Clean Break authors stipulated that ousting Hussein was needed in order to ultimately weaken Syria, and they further expressed a desire to do away with the Iranian regime, Israel’s foremost military rival in the region.
In April 2002, PNAC neocons sought to capitalize on the 9/11 attacks to expedite their agenda of Iraq’s destruction, calling on President Bush in a written plea to “support Israel” in its “war on terrorism” by accelerating “plans for removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.” Israeli citizens Perle, Feith and Wurmser effectively put their wet dreams of war into practice by entering senior policy-making positions in the US administration of George W. Bush, leading the drive for the war in Iraq alongside the Israeli fifth columnist Paul Wolfowitz who in turn was a high ranking Pentagon official under Bush. Researchers fingered Feith’s ‘Office of Special Plans’ in the Pentagon as the fountainhead of disinformation and propaganda about Iraq’s non-existent “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” a devious ploy also promoted in Neocon-Zionist literature throughout the 1990s.
And who devised the ‘war on terror’? Despite popular belief among leftists, that ominous philosophy’s birthplace was not in the dysfunctional brain of George W. Bush. Rather, it first emerged at the Jonathan Institute’s ‘Conference on International Terrorism’ held in 1979 in Jerusalem. That group was spearheaded by Israeli politicians of the Likudnik persuasion, principally Benjamin Netanyahu, who endeavored to export their propagandistic memes about ‘terrorism’ to the West, hoping Western governments would do Israel’s bidding in the region. The foundry of lies and untruths sponsored by Netanyahu and his neocon minions in Washington was ultimately calculated to delegitimize Arab/Muslim resistance to Israeli imperial expansion and aggression, hence the widespread dissemination via Zionist-owned media venues of the erroneous contention that ‘Islamic terrorism’ is a unique threat facing the West. In actual fact, the biggest perpetrators and patrons of terrorist violence in the world are the Zionists, the Americans and their allies.
Unsolved Mysteries and Unanswered Questions
Writing in his informative essay “The War on Iraq: Conceived in Israel,” Dr. Stephen Sniegoski asserts “the ‘war on terrorism’ was never intended to be a war to apprehend and punish the perpetrators of the September 11 atrocities. September 11 simply provided a pretext for government leaders to implement long-term policy plans.” Indeed, the ‘war on terror’ amounted to nothing less than a ‘war of terror’ against Israel’s opponents in the Middle East, with 9/11 serving as a very conveniently timed casus belli.
And what of Israel’s Mossad, that “ruthless and cunning” agency of terror that “has the capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act,” according to a group of US Army analysts? As the Army School of Advanced Military Studies acknowledged in the aforesaid study, Israel’s proclivity for ruthlessness and deception leads many to believe that 9/11 was yet another ‘false flag’ contrivance of the master manipulators in Tel Aviv.
What really happened on that fateful day?
There are many lingering questions about Israel’s role in the attacks. An oft-cited proof of Israeli involvement is the ‘five dancing Israelis’ incident, wherein a group of five individuals, later identified by ABC News, the Jewish Forward and FBI insiders as Mossad agents, were seen by witnesses video-taping the disaster from a New Jersey rooftop, and subsequently cheering, laughing and shouting with “joy and mockery” as 3000 innocents were suffocating in the burning Twin Towers.
The suspicious crew of Israelis were arrested on that day by the East Rutherford PD, and later questioned by the FBI about possible foreknowledge of the attacks. Considering they had shown up (with a video camera) in a very convenient spot at a very opportune time of the day, just as everything went down, and expressed outwardly signs of elation rather than fear and horror, it beggars belief to suggest they didn’t know exactly when, where and how the assaults on the Twin Towers would come to pass. In fact, FBI reports partially declassified in 2005 revealed that one of the arrested Israelis named Omer Marmari told authorities that he and his compatriots were acting in a celebratory manner because the attacks would help make the world “understand” Israel’s predicament vis-à-vis the Palestinians. “We’re Israelis. We’re not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem,” Israeli Sivan Kurzburg told the NYPD upon his arrest. While in custody, another of the five Israelis named Oded Ellner remarked: “the United States will [now] take steps to stop terrorism in the world.” How did any of them know for sure who did 9/11 before any investigation had been conducted or how the US’s response to the attacks would benefit their country? Did they not only know when and where the attacks would occur, but also who would be blamed for it and the consequent direction of US foreign policy? That’s way more information a group of self-professed ‘furniture movers’ should be privy to. The five Israeli suspects were eventually deported back to Israel without charge. In an article about the incident, journalist Christopher Ketcham quoted an anonymous CIA insider close to the investigation into the five Israelis who said “the decision to close down the investigation into the Israelis came from the White House” and that “[i]t was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11.”
And what of those 200 Israelis that Fox News reported had been arrested shortly before and after 9/11, some of whom claimed to be ‘art students’ but were in actuality Mossad spies with expertise in eavesdropping and explosives? What of the mysterious ‘truck bomb’ or ‘explosive laden van’ which was reported to have been ‘packed with explosives’ as it approached the George Washington Bridge? Why were the identities of the apprehended suspects never revealed to the public? Was it because they were Israelis and not Arabs? Is it just a coincidence that the Mossad passed along a very vague and dubious ‘warning’ to the CIA a few months before the attacks, suggesting that 200 ‘Arab terrorists’ were present on American soil and were planning a ‘major operation’? And is it not amazingly conspicuous that the Mossad linked this ‘imminent attack’ of which they had no specific information to “Osama bin Laden and Iraq,” as the UK’s Telegraph reported?
What about the ‘mural van’ that police stopped between 6th and 7th on King Street near the World Trade Center on 9/11? Surely a van with a painting depicting a plane crashing into the Twin Towers that was rented to ‘ethnic Middle Easterners’ according to a Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) report is worthy of scrutiny. If the ‘ethnic Middle Easterners’ behind such an obvious display of foreknowledge were Arabs or Muslims, surely the Zionist-influenced mass media would have reported it, and surely the Zionist-influenced US government would have included it in official reports. But nary a mention of the incident can be found in media or government reports concerning the attacks.
How do we explain the mysterious acquisition of the entire World Trade Center complex by shady New York businessman Larry Silverstein six weeks before the attacks? The Jewish real estate magnate who weirdly “felt a compelling urge” to own the worthless, asbestos-laden Twin Towers happens to be a rabid Zionist with innumerable connections to Zionist lobbies, most notably the Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS) under whose auspices the Zionist neocons produced the “Clean Break” regime change manifesto. On top of that, Silverstein was a ‘personal friend’ of Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon, and had weekly conference calls with Netanyahu. Moreover, ‘Lucky Larry’ skipped out on a routine business meeting at the top of the North Tower (the first one hit) on 9/11, claiming a ‘miraculous’ intercession by his wife who insisted he attend a ‘doctor’s appointment’ instead. Silverstein’s business partner on the murky WTC deal, Frank Lowy, is likewise an ardent Zionist Jew who fought in Israel’s ‘war of ethnic cleansing’ and chairs multiple pro-Israel think tanks in Israel itself as well as in Australia where he acts as Tel Aviv’s pro-bono ambassador.
And what of the lack of any credible evidence tying Arabs or Muslims to the attacks? What about the ‘indestructible passport’ of alleged hijacker Satam al-Suqami which miraculously escaped the cabin of the exploded plane into the North Tower, falling hundreds of feet to the ground and emerging without so much as a blemish? Why even bring a passport on a domestic flight let alone a suicide mission? What of the plethora of other eyebrow-raising FBI ‘discoveries,’ such as the inexplicable Mohammed Atta luggage filled to the brim with incriminating ‘evidence’ including Atta’s ‘al-Qaeda plans,’ Arabic-language flight training devices/videos, a Koran, etc. It is the height of credulity to believe that this luggage, which a former FBI agent told Newsday amounted to the “Rosetta stone” of the investigation, conveniently did not get loaded onto the plane and fell right into the FBI’s lap. Does that not reek of a cheesy Hollywood stage-play for the gullible public’s consumption?
What about the markedly un-Islamic theatrics of the ‘19 martyrs for Allah’ who were witnessed cavorting with strippers, taking drugs and binge drinking in bars and clubs throughout Florida and Las Vegas months before the attacks? Why would dedicated ‘jihadists’ who we are told obsessively observed Islamic laws and edicts behave in this blasphemous way shortly before a ‘martyrdom operation’? Isn’t the obvious answer that these folks weren’t real Muslims and were just pretending to be in order to create a phony ‘evidence trail’ for an equally bogus ‘al-Qaeda plot’?
Has it ever been sufficiently explained why several of the named ‘9/11 hijackers’ turned up alive and well in the Middle East, protesting their innocence, as the BBC reported? Could the fact that their passports had been lost and/or stolen in the years preceding the attacks indicate a frame-up at work? Are the CIA and Mossad not experts at stealing identities of innocent people for use on covert ops? Doesn’t Mossad have a ‘special unit’ for crafting fake passports to be used on foreign missions?
Has there ever been a credible explanation as to why most of the ‘19 hijackers’ gained entry to America through a CIA ‘fast-tracking’ VISA program run out of a US consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, as J. Michael Springmann revealed?
Can we explain how America’s multi-billion dollar military, intelligence and defence apparatus, which consists of a dozen or so intelligence agencies and the most sophisticated defence and spy equipment and networks the world has ever seen, was astoundingly ‘asleep at the wheel’ and ‘unable to detect’ this plot and its rather clumsy progenitors? As the former Pakistani spy chief Hamid Gul mused with bewilderment, “a man living in a cave inside a mountain or a peasant’s hovel” was able to orchestrate 9/11 and thereby outfox the combined military might of America and its powerful allies? “I don’t believe it,” Gul retorted.
Has it ever been properly explained how shoddy pilots who never flew commercial aircraft in their lives were able to precision guide three planes into their targets without a hiccup? How could a plane enter the Pentagon’s highly-protected and watched airspace without fighter jets intercepting it? Is it not odd that whoever was at the controls of Flight 77, or whatever actually hit the Pentagon, decided to not dive into the roof of the building, which would have been a much safer and easier-to-hit target than the façade? Is it just a coincidence that the very side of the building which was hit had just been ‘recently renovated’ with blast-walls and other upgrades so that it could endure explosive impacts with minimal damage? Is it also mere happenstance that all of the Pentagon’s top brass including Donald Rumsfeld were on the opposite side of the building, safely out of harm’s way?
Can we explain how two giant skyscrapers can collapse to the ground at nearly free fall speed, hurling hundred-ton chunks of steel structure hundreds of feet horizontally, simply from the impact of planes and a few scattered fires? Has there ever been a sufficient explanation as to how gravity can pulverize into dust large portions of two 110-story buildings? How did WTC Building 7 – the 47-story high-rise that was not hit by a plane – collapse neatly and symmetrically like a controlled demolition into its own footprint at free fall speed? Does it not defy logic, common sense and even basic laws of physics that no explosives were involved in the gravity-defying collapses of these enormous structures?
These are merely a few of the hundreds of enduring questions that have haunted the US government and its apologists for years.
It is safe to say that satisfactory answers to these very valid and logical inquires will not be forthcoming. Truth cannot prevail so long as the Neocon-Zionist clique which usurped the Bush administration and instigated the calamitous ‘war of civilizations’ by way of monstrous lies and deceit is running the show in Washington and other epicenters of power that effectively dominate the world at the present time.
Copyright 2015 Brandon Martinez

No comments:

Post a Comment