4 days ago – It's unknown who bought the apartment, or if pilgrims will be allowed to take a private tour by the new owner. However, there are plenty of places to visit listed on the Breivik Timeline for anyone planning a trip to Norway.
3 days ago – June 29, 2013 at 10:32 am. [...] This is it. This is the day Britain surrendered; Prof Moon's 'comments on Mark Steyn and linking him to Anders Breivikare something else'; SECTION 13 IS DEAD! Canada's 'hate speech' law ...
Jan 10, 2010 – Screening system developed by ICTS International should have flagged... However, the security supervisor representing I-SEC and PI allowed him to get ... to airports in 11 countries including France, Britain, Spain, Hungary, ...
You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 4/10/12
ICTS International N.V. - An Israeli Owned Company: ... Today, I-SEC operates in The Netherlands, France, Germany, UK, Spain, ..... However, the security supervisor representing I-SEC and PI allowed him to get on the flight.
You've visited this page 5 times. Last visit: 6/29/13
Jan 18, 2010 – ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security ... news sources in Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy. ... The Israeli firm, ICTS, and two of its subsidiaries are at the crux of an international...
Jan 16, 2010 – Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International(ICFI) ...ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security screening of ...sources in Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy.
Jan 16, 2010 – Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International(ICFI) ...ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security screening of ...sources in Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy. ... The company also handled security for London's bus system during the July 7, ...
Jan 18, 2010 – ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security screening ...sources in Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy. ... The company also handled security for London's bus system during the July ... The Israeli firm, ICTS, and two of its subsidiaries are at the crux of an international...
[Archive] International Consultants On Targeted Security - I.C.T.S. : Airline ...approach occurred before an El Al flight from Heathrow Airport, near London, to Tel Aviv.... in 11 countries including France, Britain, Spain, Hungary, Romania and Russia. ...ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security screening of ...
By Dave Rich, CST Deputy Director of Communications First published in the CST Blog For a general analysis on Trans-European Trends in Right Wing Extremism please click here.
While acknowledging that violent revolution will not be supported by all “cultural conservatives“, nonetheless Breivik tries to construct a more broad political programme to unite all such organisations across Europe, based on some of the above positions. In Britain, unsurprisingly, he identifies the BNP, the National Front and various English nationalist organisations and websites as potential members of such a “non-military” alliance. After the revolution, Breivik writes, mass-participation democracy will be replaced with “a model more resembling the Russian system of administered democracy”.
Attitude towards Jews and Israel
Some commentators have latched onto Breivik’s expressed support for Israel, for example in the above doctrine. Again, this reflects a wider shift on parts (but certainly not all) of the European far right, from antisemitism as an unshakeable, core belief, to a more favourable view of Israel based on the idea of ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’.
Breivik in fact is very critical of neo-Nazis who “obsess so much over the Jews“. He claims to hate Adolf Hitler, because Hitler’s obsessive hatred of Jews, and the subsequent Holocaust (which he does not deny), is what gave birth to the multiculturalism that he believes will eventually destroy Europe. As there are only 950 Jews in Norway, Breivik argues, it is ridiculous to claim that they control the government and are responsible for multiculturalism. However, his attitude towards Jews is not positive. He believes that wherever Jews live in large numbers, they create a problem for that country:
There is no Jewish problem in Western Europe (with the exception of the UK and France) as we only have 1 million in Western Europe, whereas 800 000 out of these 1 million live in France and the UK. The US on the other hand, with more than 6 million Jews (600% more than Europe) actually has a considerable Jewish problem.
Breivik believes that Jews should be treated like every other European: those who are multiculturalist traitors are enemies, while those who are culturally conservative are potential allies. But what are the proportions of Jews who fall into these two categories?
So, are the current Jews in Europe and US disloyal? The multiculturalist (nation-wrecking) Jews ARE while the conservative Jews ARE NOT. Aprox. 75% of European/US Jews support multiculturalism while aprox. 50% of Israeli Jews does the same. This shows very clearly that we must embrace the remaining loyal Jews as brothers rather than repeating the mistake of the NSDAP…Never target a Jew because he is a Jew, but rather because he is a category A or B traitor. And don’t forget that the bulk of the category A and B traitors are Christian Europeans. 90% of the category A and B traitors in my own country, Norway, are Nordic, Christian category A and B traitors.
It is striking that, even as someone who describes himself as “pro-Israel”, Breivik believes that half of all Israeli Jews are enemies who, presumably, must be killed, imprisoned or punished in some other way; as are three-quarters of European and American Jews. Classical antisemitism constructs an image of a typical Jew which bears no relation to reality, but is simply a cipher for all that the antisemite hates and fears. Breivik’s categorisation of the different types of Jews (and Israel) fits this way of thinking perfectly.
Breivik & the English Defence League
There has been much discussion about Breivik’s contacts with the English Defence League. Breivik advocates using Facebook to win supporters and spread political beliefs (he complains at one point that Facebook only allows him to befriend 50 people each day), and he appears to have been in contact with large numbers of EDL members in this way:
I used to have more than 600 EDL members as Facebook friends and have spoken with tens of EDL members and leaders. In fact; I was one of the individuals who supplied them with processed ideological material (including rhetorical strategies) in the very beginning.
He also commends them on their approach:
The British EDL seems to be the first youth organisation that has finally understood this. Sure, in the beginning it was the occasional egg heads who shouted racist slogans and did Nazi salutes but these individuals were kicked out. An organisation such as the EDL has the moral high ground and can easily justify their political standpoints as they publicly oppose racism and authoritarianism.
When they “bait” the UAF, and Jihadi youth (in the thousands) in to rioting, they ensure that the riots are covered by national and international press. During the Harrod (sic) protest there were only 16 or so from SIOE and EDL, while there were 3000+ Marxist extremists and Jihadi youth. While it is perhaps morally questionable to bait like this they enticed an overreaction which again lead to “favourable” coverage (a significantly unfavourable coverage of Marxist extremists and Jihadi youth). Favourable in the sense that Brits gets an indication of the true potency and potential threat of the Jihadi mob, which again results in more Europeans waking up from their self induced coma.
However, by February of this year Breivik appears to have given up on the EDL:
The EDL, although having noble intentions are in fact dangerously naïve. EDL and KT principles can never be reconciled as we are miles apart ideologically AND organizationally. The EDL even rejects taking a stand against multiculturalism which proves that they are even more naïve than Sarkozy, Merkel and Cameron who have all admitted that multiculturalism has been a failure and a disaster for Europe…KT was formed back in 2002 as a revolutionary conservative movement because we had lost hope that the democratic framework can solve Europe’s current problems. The EDL, on the other hand, IS a democratic movement. They STILL believe that the democratic system can solve Britain’s problems… This is why the EDL harshly condemns any and all revolutionary conservative movements that employ terror as a tool, such as the KT. And this is why, we, the KT view the EDL as naïve fools, wasting all their energy monkey-screaming to deaf ears while they should instead have focused on means and methods that are meaningful in regards to achieving true political change, in regards to tearing down the multiculturalist regime known as Britain. Unfortunately, the only meaningful resistance at this point in time is to use military force.
This may reflect the development in Breivik’s political thinking towards terrorism, as much as any changes in the EDL. However, Breivik is not the only convicted far right terrorist to have had contact with the EDL. It may be best to view the EDL as a gateway organisation: one which does not carry out or explicitly support terrorism itself, but creates and promotes the political discourse and identity-based grievance narrative, from which a small number of individuals move on to terrorism. As such, it demands the appropriate level of intelligence monitoring and police scrutiny, as is applied to similar gateway organisations in the Islamist world.