Sergey Brin and Larry Page now use internet to hide info as much as to make it available and findable. They work for the finavcial military industrial elite which means mainly Jewish billionaires in NY,City of London,Russia,Israel,Australia and around the world.They know your social security card number and all your financial transaction through your gmail and so do their bosses......
Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham acknowleges below that CIA behind Google-Stanford University Russian Israeli fraudsterSergey Brin and Larry Page.To say they invented what is now called Google is more ridiculous than claiming Al Gore invented the internet.
In colluding with Jewish Zionists who control the U.S. and much of world stock markets to take Google public after funding Sergey Brin and Larry Page the CIA IN MANY WAYS HAS AIDED AND ABETTED THE VERY INTERNATIONAL RUSSIAN JEWISH MAFIA IT SHOULD BE WORKING IN THE INTERESTS OF U.S.. PUBLIC TO BRING TO ITS HEELS AND UNDER CONTROL.They are both more Israeli and Russian than they are American !
Social Media Is a Tool of the CIA. Seriously - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › MoneyWatch › Markets
Jul 11, 2011 - You don't need to wear a tinfoil hat to believe that the CIA is using Facebook, Twitter, Google (GOOG) and other social media to spy on people. That's because the CIA publishes a helpful list of press releases on all the social media ventures it sponsors, via its technology investment arm In-Q-Tel..How the CIA made Google – INSURGE intelligence – Medium
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e
Jan 22, 2015 - In 1999, the CIA created its own venture capital investment firm, In-Q-Tel, to fund promising start-ups that might create technologies useful for intelligence agencies. But the inspiration for In-Q-Tel came earlier, when the Pentagon set up its own private sector outfit. Known as the 'Highlands Forum,' this . .....Thuraisingham's account, including her new amended version, therefore demonstrates that the CIA-NSA-MDDS program was not only partly funding Brin throughout his work with Larry Pagedeveloping Google, but that senior US intelligence representatives including a CIA official oversaw the evolution of ...
Google: seeded by the Pentagon | TABU; Towards A Better ...
https://tabublog.com/2016/01/19/google-seeded-by-the-pentagon/
Jan 19, 2016 - Brin and Page officially incorporated Google as a company in September 1998, the very month they last reported to Thuraisingham and Steinheiser. 'Query Flocks' was also part of Google'spatented 'PageRank' search system, which Brin developed at Stanford under the CIA-NSA-MDDS programme, ..
Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham acknowleges below that CIA behind Google-Stanford University Russian Israeli fraudsterSergey Brin and Larry Page.To say they invented what is now called Google is more ridiculous than claiming Al Gore invented the internet.
.[PDF]
Correction to my article posted on March 25, 2013 - UT Dallas
https://www.utdallas.edu/~bxt043000/.../Big_Data-Have_we_seen_it_before.pdf
Mar 25, 2013 - Correction to my article posted on March 25, 2013. Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham. January 25, 2015. My article dated March 25, 2013 (Big Data: Have we seen it before?) posted on my web sitehas been used by Dr. Nafeez Ahmed to promote his view that the CIA was behind Google.
https://www.utdallas.edu/~bxt043000/Motivational-Articles/Big_Data-Have_we_seen_it_before.pdf
Dr. Ahmed called me from the UK on January 21, 2015 for about 5-10 minutes to find out more about the
MDDS program that I was working on in the 1990s and how it impacted Google. I replied that I did not
know about MDDS’ impact on Google as other agencies were also funding Stanford University on
massive data technologies (e.g., the digital library effort by NSF) at that time. I explained that efforts like
MDDS have provided the foundations for some of the solutions being proposed to big data management
today. I was given the impression that Dr. Ahmed was interested in writing about the history of Google
and big data technologies. Therefore, I was disappointed and dismayed to read his article dated January
22, 2015 which has twisted my words to put a negative spin on MDDS and Google. Furthermore, Dr.
Ahmed has taken pieces of information out of context from different sources and put them together to tell
a story that CIA funding was behind Google.
In my article dated March 25, 2013, I made a statement that Mr. Sergey Brin (Google co-founder while at
Stanford), Prof. Jeffery Ullman (from Stanford) and Dr. Chris Clifton (then at MITRE) developed the
Query Flocks system. This is because at that time I believed that this was the case. However, in Dr.
Ahmed’s article posted on January 22, 2015, a Google Director of Communications has stated that Mr.
Sergey Brin never worked on Query Flocks. Based on this information, I would like to make a change to
my article dated March 25, 2013. Specifically, the second paragraph of my March 25, 2013 article should
read as follows:......................
Exclusive: Google, CIA Invest in 'Future' of Web Monitoring | WIRED
https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/
Jul 28, 2010 - It's not the very first time Google has done business with America's spy agencies. Long before it reportedly enlisted the help of the National Security Agency to secure its networks, Google sold equipment to the secret signals-intelligence group. In-Q-Tel backed the mapping firm Keyhole, which was bought ...The CIA's In-Q-Tel is Investing in Startups That Can Predict the Future ...
https://www.gaia.com/lp/content/what-is-cia-in-q-tel/
Sep 1, 2017 - In-Q-Tel's Keyhole Becomes Google Earth. In the early 2000s, the development of GoogleEarth made geospatial technology an exciting prospect in the tech world. Unsurprisingly, this technology was controversial and banned in some countries due to national security concerns and privacy issues. What is ...Pando: The CIA helped sell a mapping startup to Google. Now they ...
https://pando.com/2015/07/01/cia-foia-google-keyhole/
Jul 1, 2015 - In-Q-Tel, a venture capital fund run by the CIA on behalf of the military and intelligence community, made a “strategic investment” in Keyhole in February 2003, a month before the US launched Operation Iraqi Freedom. In a press release announcing the investment a few months later, In-Q-Teldiscussed ...Sergey Brin and Larry Page now use internet to hide info as much as to make it available and findable. They work for the financial military industrial elite which means mainly Jewish billionaires in NY,City of London,Russia,Israel,Australia and around the world.They know your social security card number and all your financial transaction through your gmail and so do their bosses.
Note the NY Times or Jew York Times,(the nasty white Jews who own the NY Times insult those born Jewish by being nasty Zionists and lieing about WMDS in Iraq leading to well over a million being people killed there and thus themselves defame Jews,not me who only seeks the truth),used their digital rag to attack me and NY Post writer Christopher Byron,Byron also has some guilt in not defending me,his source,and himself mentioning Belladore Group in Kuala Lumpur,the CIA's SRA International whose shares were being sold by Peter Taylor of Beledor Group to Hong Kong until Hong Kong SEC put a stop to it,unlike our own SEC who aided and abettetd CIA and Belador Group's Peter Taylor who probably had Beritish MI5 or MI6 'inteligence¡ connections. Also they were selling a 3 cent penny stock called Endovasc that ripped me off among others.......
Spy-Fund Story vs. Spy-Fund Story - DealBook - The New York Times
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/spy-fund-story-vs-spy-fund-story/
May 18, 2006 - Tony Ryals. Dear Chris Byron, re CIA,Bellador Group,etc. By Makram Majid Chams on 5/18/2006 8:56:54 PM E-mail: endoscam@lycos.com. Dear Chris Byron,. Thanks for your kind mention in your last In Q Tel article,I do indeed wish to bring all attention I can to both Bellador Group of Kuala Lumpur and ...Auric Goldfinger's Short List | Stock Discussion Forums - Silicon Investor
www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsgs.aspx?subjectid=19673&msgnum=17730...
May 13, 2006 - Last week, one left-leaning Web site reported that SEC investigators think the CIATHE DIRTIEST SPIES IN THE VENTURE CAPITAL BUSINESS: IN-Q ...
https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/.../the-dirtiest-spies-in-the-venture-capital-business-in-...
Aug 5, 2015 - Last week, one left-leaning Web site reported that SEC investigators think the CIA
https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/.../the-dirtiest-spies-in-the-venture-capital-business-in-...
Aug 5, 2015 - Last week, one left-leaning Web site reported that SEC investigators think the CIAWhy does blogger continue to harass me for criticizing fascism and ...
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/blogger/zylND5XkxTU;...my...
Dec 22, 2017 - 3 posts - 2 authors
I can't say for sure but I think perhaps my recent blogging about a 'Canadian' named Amir Adnaniwhose UEC or Uranium Energy Corp is now fracking the earth and groundwater of Goliad Texas for uranium and is promoted by Agora Inc's CIA connected Doug Casey and Porter Stansberry(former editor of ...wolfblitzzer0: CIA Connected Arab Terrorist Amir Adnani Securities ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.ru/2017/11/fracking-for-uranium-first-accidentally.html
Nov 5, 2017 - CIA Connected Arab Terrorist Amir Adnani Securities Fraudster Fracking For Uranium In Texas Connected To CIA's,J.D.Davidson's Agora Inc. Agora Inc.'s founder James Dale Davidson and Porter Stansberry whose employee Ray Rivera running a penny stock promotion mailing called Rebound Report ...Google,Youtube In Bed With Gold Uranium Frauds,Crimes Of CIA ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.ca/2017/12/google-in-bed-w.html
Google,Youtube In Bed With Gold Uranium Frauds,Crimes Of CIA Agora Inc,J.D.political and science rhymes: amir adnani vancouver uec porter ...
politicalandsciencerhymes.blogspot.com/2017/.../amir-adnani-vancouver-uec-porter.h...
Nov 2, 2017 - amir adnani vancouver uec porter stansberry uranium pump and dump. uranium endovasc porter ... 2011 - From: "Porter Stansberry" [Save Address] [Block Sender] [This Is Spam] .... as his Agora Inc.,'Vantage Point' fraud in touting Endovasc and Genemax and then ... Bonner should be proud of his chum ...https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance/
Google’s true origin partly lies in CIA and NSA research grants for mass surveillance
The CIA and NSA’s end goal
Google has said in the past that it was not funded or created by the CIA. For instance, when stories circulated in 2006 that Google had received funding from the intelligence community for years to assist in counter-terrorism efforts, the company told Wired magazine founder John Battelle, “The statements related to Google are completely untrue.”
Did the CIA directly fund the work of Brin and Page, and therefore create Google? No. But were Brin and Page researching precisely what the NSA, the CIA, and the intelligence community hoped for, assisted by their grants? Absolutely.............................
The research arms of the CIA and NSA hoped that the best computer-science minds in academia could identify what they called “birds of a feather:” Just as geese fly together in large V shapes, or flocks of sparrows make sudden movements together in harmony, they predicted that like-minded groups of humans would move together online. The intelligence community named their first unclassified briefing for scientists the “birds of a feather” briefing, and the “Birds of a Feather Session on the Intelligence Community Initiative in Massive Digital Data Systems” took place at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose in the spring of 1995.
The intelligence community named their first unclassified briefing for scientists the “birds of a feather” briefing. Their research aim was to track digital fingerprints inside the rapidly expanding global information network, which was then known as the World Wide Web. Could an entire world of digital information be organized so that the requests humans made inside such a network be tracked and sorted? Could their queries be linked and ranked in order of importance? Could “birds of a feather” be identified inside this sea of information so that communities and groups could be tracked in an organized way?
By working with emerging commercial-data companies, their intent was to track like-minded groups of people across the internet and identify them from the digital fingerprints they left behind, much like forensic scientists use fingerprint smudges to identify criminals. Just as “birds of a feather flock together,” they predicted that potential terrorists would communicate with each other in this new global, connected world—and they could find them by identifying patterns in this massive amount of new information. Once these groups were identified, they could then follow their digital trails everywhere.
Sergey Brin and Larry Page, computer-science boy wonders
In 1995, one of the first and most promising MDDS grants went to a computer-science research team at Stanford University with a decade-long history of working with NSF and DARPA grants. The primary objective of this grant was “query optimization of very complex queries that are described using the ‘query flocks’ approach.” A second grant—the DARPA-NSF grant most closely associated with Google’s origin—was part of a coordinated effort to build a massive digital library using the internet as its backbone. Both grants funded research by two graduate students who were making rapid advances in web-page ranking, as well as tracking (and making sense of) user queries: future Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page.
The research by Brin and Page under these grants became the heart of Google: people using search functions to find precisely what they wanted inside a very large data set. The intelligence community, however, saw a slightly different benefit in their research: Could the network be organized so efficiently that individual users could be uniquely identified and tracked?
This process is perfectly suited for the purposes of counter-terrorism and homeland security efforts: Human beings and like-minded groups who might pose a threat to national security can be uniquely identified online before they do harm. This explains why the intelligence community found Brin’s and Page’s research efforts so appealing; prior to this time, the CIA largely used human intelligence efforts in the field to identify people and groups that might pose threats. The ability to track them virtually (in conjunction with efforts in the field) would change everything.
It was the beginning of what in just a few years’ time would become Google. The two intelligence-community managers charged with leading the program met regularly with Brin as his research progressed, and he was an author on several other research papers that resulted from this MDDS grant before he and Page left to form Google.
The grants allowed Brin and Page to do their work and contributed to their breakthroughs in web-page ranking and tracking user queries. Brin didn’t work for the intelligence community—or for anyone else. Google had not yet been incorporated. He was just a Stanford researcher taking advantage of the grant provided by the NSA and CIA through the unclassified MDDS program.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
.................................................
Two decades ago, the US intelligence community worked closely with Silicon Valley in an effort to track citizens in cyberspace. And Google is at the heart of that origin story. Some of the research that led to Google’s ambitious creation was funded and coordinated by a research group established by the intelligence community to find ways to track individuals and groups online.
The intelligence community hoped that the nation’s leading computer scientists could take non-classified information and user data, combine it with what would become known as the internet, and begin to create for-profit, commercial enterprises to suit the needs of both the intelligence community and the public. They hoped to direct the supercomputing revolution from the start in order to make sense of what millions of human beings did inside this digital information network. That collaboration has made a comprehensive public-private mass surveillance state possible today.
The story of the deliberate creation of the modern mass-surveillance state includes elements of Google’s surprising, and largely unknown, origin. It is a somewhat different creation story than the one the public has heard, and explains what Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page set out to build, and why.
But this isn’t just the origin story of Google: It’s the origin story of the mass-surveillance state, and the government money that funded it.
Backstory: The intelligence community and Silicon Valley
In the mid 1990s, the intelligence community in America began to realize that they had an opportunity. The supercomputing community was just beginning to migrate from university settings into the private sector, led by investments from a place that would come to be known as Silicon Valley.
The intelligence community wanted to shape Silicon Valley’s efforts at their inception so they would be useful for homeland security purposes. A digital revolution was underway: one that would transform the world of data gathering and how we make sense of massive amounts of information. The intelligence community wanted to shape Silicon Valley’s supercomputing efforts at their inception so they would be useful for both military and homeland security purposes. Could this supercomputing network, which would become capable of storing terabytes of information, make intelligent sense of the digital trail that human beings leave behind?
Answering this question was of great interest to the intelligence community.
Intelligence-gathering may have been their world, but the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) had come to realize that their future was likely to be profoundly shaped outside the government. It was at a time when military and intelligence budgets within the Clinton administration were in jeopardy, and the private sector had vast resources at their disposal. If the intelligence community wanted to conduct mass surveillance for national security purposes, it would require cooperation between the government and the emerging supercomputing companies.
To do this, they began reaching out to the scientists at American universities who were creating this supercomputing revolution. These scientists were developing ways to do what no single group of human beings sitting at work stations in the NSA and the CIA could ever hope to do: gather huge amounts of data and make intelligent sense of it.
A rich history of the government’s science funding
There was already a long history of collaboration between America’s best scientists and the intelligence community, from the creation of the atomic bomb and satellite technology to efforts to put a man on the moon.
The internet itself was created because of an intelligence effort. In fact, the internet itself was created because of an intelligence effort: In the 1970s, the agency responsible for developing emerging technologies for military, intelligence, and national security purposes—the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)—linked four supercomputers to handle massive data transfers. It handed the operations off to the National Science Foundation (NSF) a decade or so later, which proliferated the network across thousands of universities and, eventually, the public, thus creating the architecture and scaffolding of the World Wide Web.
Silicon Valley was no different. By the mid 1990s, the intelligence community was seeding funding to the most promising supercomputing efforts across academia, guiding the creation of efforts to make massive amounts of information useful for both the private sector as well as the intelligence community.
They funded these computer scientists through an unclassified, highly compartmentalized program that was managed for the CIA and the NSA by large military and intelligence contractors. It was called the Massive Digital Data Systems (MDDS) project.
The Massive Digital Data Systems (MDDS) project
MDDS was introduced to several dozen leading computer scientists at Stanford, CalTech, MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Harvard, and others in a white paper that described what the CIA, NSA, DARPA, and other agencies hoped to achieve. The research would largely be funded and managed by unclassified science agencies like NSF, which would allow the architecture to be scaled up in the private sector if it managed to achieve what the intelligence community hoped for.
“Not only are activities becoming more complex, but changing demands require that the IC [Intelligence Community] process different types as well as larger volumes of data,” the intelligence community said in its 1993 MDDS white paper. “Consequently, the IC is taking a proactive role in stimulating research in the efficient management of massive databases and ensuring that IC requirements can be incorporated or adapted into commercial products. Because the challenges are not unique to any one agency, the Community Management Staff (CMS) has commissioned a Massive Digital Data Systems [MDDS] Working Group to address the needs and to identify and evaluate possible solutions.”
Over the next few years, the program’s stated aim was to provide more than a dozen grants of several million dollars each to advance this research concept. The grants were to be directed largely through the NSF so that the most promising, successful efforts could be captured as intellectual property and form the basis of companies attracting investments from Silicon Valley. This type of public-to-private innovation system helped launch powerful science and technology companies like Qualcomm, Symantec, Netscape, and others, and funded the pivotal research in areas like Doppler radar and fiber optics, which are central to large companies like AccuWeather, Verizon, and AT&T today. Today, the NSF provides nearly 90% of all federal funding for university-based computer-science research.
The CIA and NSA’s end goal
The research arms of the CIA and NSA hoped that the best computer-science minds in academia could identify what they called “birds of a feather:” Just as geese fly together in large V shapes, or flocks of sparrows make sudden movements together in harmony, they predicted that like-minded groups of humans would move together online. The intelligence community named their first unclassified briefing for scientists the “birds of a feather” briefing, and the “Birds of a Feather Session on the Intelligence Community Initiative in Massive Digital Data Systems” took place at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose in the spring of 1995.
The intelligence community named their first unclassified briefing for scientists the “birds of a feather” briefing. Their research aim was to track digital fingerprints inside the rapidly expanding global information network, which was then known as the World Wide Web. Could an entire world of digital information be organized so that the requests humans made inside such a network be tracked and sorted? Could their queries be linked and ranked in order of importance? Could “birds of a feather” be identified inside this sea of information so that communities and groups could be tracked in an organized way?
By working with emerging commercial-data companies, their intent was to track like-minded groups of people across the internet and identify them from the digital fingerprints they left behind, much like forensic scientists use fingerprint smudges to identify criminals. Just as “birds of a feather flock together,” they predicted that potential terrorists would communicate with each other in this new global, connected world—and they could find them by identifying patterns in this massive amount of new information. Once these groups were identified, they could then follow their digital trails everywhere.
Sergey Brin and Larry Page, computer-science boy wonders
In 1995, one of the first and most promising MDDS grants went to a computer-science research team at Stanford University with a decade-long history of working with NSF and DARPA grants. The primary objective of this grant was “query optimization of very complex queries that are described using the ‘query flocks’ approach.” A second grant—the DARPA-NSF grant most closely associated with Google’s origin—was part of a coordinated effort to build a massive digital library using the internet as its backbone. Both grants funded research by two graduate students who were making rapid advances in web-page ranking, as well as tracking (and making sense of) user queries: future Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page.
The research by Brin and Page under these grants became the heart of Google: people using search functions to find precisely what they wanted inside a very large data set. The intelligence community, however, saw a slightly different benefit in their research: Could the network be organized so efficiently that individual users could be uniquely identified and tracked?
This process is perfectly suited for the purposes of counter-terrorism and homeland security efforts: Human beings and like-minded groups who might pose a threat to national security can be uniquely identified online before they do harm. This explains why the intelligence community found Brin’s and Page’s research efforts so appealing; prior to this time, the CIA largely used human intelligence efforts in the field to identify people and groups that might pose threats. The ability to track them virtually (in conjunction with efforts in the field) would change everything.
It was the beginning of what in just a few years’ time would become Google. The two intelligence-community managers charged with leading the program met regularly with Brin as his research progressed, and he was an author on several other research papers that resulted from this MDDS grant before he and Page left to form Google.
The grants allowed Brin and Page to do their work and contributed to their breakthroughs in web-page ranking and tracking user queries. Brin didn’t work for the intelligence community—or for anyone else. Google had not yet been incorporated. He was just a Stanford researcher taking advantage of the grant provided by the NSA and CIA through the unclassified MDDS program.
Left out of Google’s story
The MDDS research effort has never been part of Google’s origin story, even though the principal investigator for the MDDS grant specifically named Google as directly resulting from their research: “Its core technology, which allows it to find pages far more accurately than other search engines, was partially supported by this grant,” he wrote. In a published research paper that includes some of Brin’s pivotal work, the authors also reference the NSF grant that was created by the MDDS program.
Instead, every Google creation story only mentions just one federal grant: the NSF/DARPA “digital libraries” grant, which was designed to allow Stanford researchers to search the entire World Wide Web stored on the university’s servers at the time. “The development of the Google algorithms was carried on a variety of computers, mainly provided by the NSF-DARPA-NASA-funded Digital Library project at Stanford,” Stanford’s Infolab says of its origin, for example. NSF likewise only references the digital libraries grant, not the MDDS grant as well, in its own history of Google’s origin. In the famous research paper, “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine,” which describes the creation of Google, Brin and Page thanked the NSF and DARPA for its digital library grant to Stanford. But the grant from the intelligence community’s MDDS program—specifically designed for the breakthrough that Google was built upon—has faded into obscurity.
Google has said in the past that it was not funded or created by the CIA. For instance, when stories circulated in 2006 that Google had received funding from the intelligence community for years to assist in counter-terrorism efforts, the company told Wired magazine founder John Battelle, “The statements related to Google are completely untrue.”
Did the CIA directly fund the work of Brin and Page, and therefore create Google? No. But were Brin and Page researching precisely what the NSA, the CIA, and the intelligence community hoped for, assisted by their grants? Absolutely.
The CIA and NSA funded an unclassified, compartmentalized program designed from its inception to spur something that looks almost exactly like Google. To understand this significance, you have to consider what the intelligence community was trying to achieve as it seeded grants to the best computer-science minds in academia: The CIA and NSA funded an unclassified, compartmentalized program designed from its inception to spur the development of something that looks almost exactly like Google. Brin’s breakthrough research on page ranking by tracking user queries and linking them to the many searches conducted—essentially identifying “birds of a feather”—was largely the aim of the intelligence community’s MDDS program. And Google succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
The intelligence community’s enduring legacy within Silicon Valley
Digital privacy concerns over the intersection between the intelligence community and commercial technology giants have grown in recent years. But most people still don’t understand the degree to which the intelligence community relies on the world’s biggest science and tech companies for its counter-terrorism and national-security work.
Civil-liberty advocacy groups have aired their privacy concerns for years, especially as they now relate to the Patriot Act. “Hastily passed 45 days after 9/11 in the name of national security, the Patriot Act was the first of many changes to surveillance laws that made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary Americans by expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet,” says the ACLU. “While most Americans think it was created to catch terrorists, the Patriot Act actually turns regular citizens into suspects.”
When asked, the biggest technology and communications companies—from Verizon and AT&T to Google, Facebook, and Microsoft—say that they never deliberately and proactively offer up their vast databases on their customers to federal security and law enforcement agencies: They say that they only respond to subpoenas or requests that are filed properly under the terms of the Patriot Act.
But even a cursory glance through recent public records shows that there is a treadmill of constant requests that could undermine the intent behind this privacy promise. According to the data-request records that the companies make available to the public, in the most recent reporting period between 2016 and 2017, local, state and federal government authorities seeking information related to national security, counter-terrorism or criminal concerns issued more than 260,000 subpoenas, court orders, warrants, and other legal requests to Verizon, more than 250,000 such requests to AT&T, and nearly 24,000 subpoenas, search warrants, or court orders to Google. Direct national security or counter-terrorism requests are a small fraction of this overall group of requests, but the Patriot Act legal process has now become so routinized that the companies each have a group of employees who simply take care of the stream of requests.
In this way, the collaboration between the intelligence community and big, commercial science and tech companies has been wildly successful. When national security agencies need to identify and track people and groups, they know where to turn – and do so frequently. That was the goal in the beginning. It has succeeded perhaps more than anyone could have imagined at the time.
Learn how to write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.
Auric Goldfinger's Short List | Stock Discussion Forums - Silicon Investor
www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsgs.aspx?subjectid=19673&msgnum=17730...
May 13, 2006 - Last week, one left-leaning Web site reported that SEC investigators think the CIAaangirfan: MALAYSIA - BELHAJ, CIA, SODOMY
aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/12/malaysia-belhaj-cia-sodomy.html
Dec 20, 2011 - I was mentioned in an article in Rupert Murdoch's NY Post by Christopher Byron in April 2006 titled 'CIA Inc.Stinks' that mentioned Kuala Lumur but strangely ... The Post column also flagged comments by frequent Internet poster Tony Ryals, who accuses In-Q-Tel, variously, of participating inpenny stock ...wolfblitzzer0: NSA,CIA,Swiss Banks,SWIFT Belgium and multi trillion ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/nsaciaswiss-banksswift-belgium-and.html
Jun 10, 2013 - Also I wrote some years ago about the CIA's conflict of interest in being involved in 'public companies' and stock scams and frauds using offshore accounts .... Clinton and Barbara Boxer AidCIA'S In-Q-Tel penny stock fraud http://archive.wolfblitzzer0: Hillary Clinton,Barabara Boxer and Ionatron - the CIA's ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/hillary-clintonbarabara-boxer-and.html
Jul 23, 2013 - May 22, 2006 - SEC,Christopher Cox,Hillary Clinton and Barbara Boxer Aid CIA'S In-Q-Telpenny stock fraud ... -Chritopher Byron , New York Post ..... Ionatron, Inc. and its subsidiaries engage in the development and marketing of ... It also provides a counter-Improved Explosive Device (IED) vehicle, known ...THE DIRTIEST SPIES IN THE VENTURE CAPITAL BUSINESS: IN-Q ...
https://atvmdoe.wordpress.com/.../the-dirtiest-spies-in-the-venture-capital-business-in-...
Aug 5, 2015 - Last week, one left-leaning Web site reported that SEC investigators think the CIANY Post,NY Times,CIA Attack On Me,Tony Ryals In 2006 - political and ...
politicalandsciencerhymes.blogspot.com/.../ny-timescia-attack-on-metony-ryals-in.ht...
Dec 5, 2017 - First NY Post writer Chris Byron mentions me which starts their mad barking lying about me to defend the CIA stock criminals who ripped me off ... The truth is any mention in my writing ofKuala Lumpur at the time turns up Vellador Group thevery 'boiler room ' I was screaming about that probably had UK ...wolfblitzzer0: CIA,NSA,,9/11:SEC,Securities Exchange Corruption ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.kr/2014/09/911secsecurities-exchange-corruption.html
Sep 26, 2014 - Rupert Murdoch's NY Post mentions me briefly in article by Chris Byron in 2006. ..U.S. Guatemala Ambassador Stephen G. McFarland ,Notorious ...
rochester.indymedia.org/node/6375
Mark Cuban himself,below,will show he was probably involved in and with the boiler room. Bellador Group out of Kuala Lumpur that was 'cold calling' shares of. Endovasc the Montgomery, Texas biotech fraud that ripped me off and other worthless penny stocks as well as the CIA's and U.S.government's own 'IT' contractor ...Julian Assange,Wikileaks:Veterans Today Editor Gordon Duff is A CIA ...
chicago.indymedia.org/archive/newswire/display/92560/index.php
Dec 13, 2010 - internet to sell worthless shares of the CIA's In-Q-Tel penny stock fraud called Ionatron that claimed-lyed about having technology to remove improvised explosive devices from roads of Iraq and Afghanistan. -Tony Ryals I am asking Sibel Edmonds and Debbie Menon and Alan Sabrosky of Veterans Today ...Dubai NASDAQ,Google,NSA,SEC:Red Wall Street,Yahoo! - wolfblitzzer0
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.dk/2014/09/google-thisred-wall-streetyahoo.html
Sep 19, 2014 - James Dale Davidson's(a UK Rhodes scholar like his sometimes friend and nemesis Bill Clinton)CIA and Rothschild connected Agora Inc was in penny stock fraud collusion with James Dale Davidson who also has connections to Israel as well as Bush and Zionist bin Laden connected Carlyle.(Agora Inc is ...
No comments:
Post a Comment