Is Obama a war criminal? - Quora
https://www.quora.com/Is-Obama-a-war-criminal-1
No of course not he is the Leader of the most powerful military force on earth the U.S. does not ... ABOUT THE OBAMA/BUSH/CLINTON CRIMINAL INDICTMENT ... of suspected terrorists during the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations.Charge George W. Bush with war crimes? - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/14/frum.bush.war.crimes/
Feb 15, 2011 - David Frum says critics of George W. Bush have sought his prosecution for war crimes; Frum says the Obama administration has rightly ...The Rehabilitation of George W. Bush, War Criminal | Alternet
www.alternet.org/right-wing/rehabilitation-george-w-bush
Mar 7, 2017 - The Rehabilitation of George W. Bush, War Criminal. Don't be ... Pictures of Obamahugging Bush are not uncommon on social media. It is as if ...COLUMN: Obama's war crimes | Indiana Daily Student
www.idsnews.com/article/2016/10/obama-war-crimes
Oct 2, 2016 - President Obama's hands aren't clean. ... 3) President George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq, one of the largest war crimes in human history, ...George W. Bush 'War Crimes' Trial Begins In California Court
yournewswire.com › News
Dec 7, 2016 - W Bush may face trial for committing war crimes in Iraq, in an ... Now they must get on toObama's war crimes trial, and Dick Cheney must get ...George W. Bush May Stand Trial For War Crimes In Iraq – True Activist
www.trueactivist.com/george-w-bush-may-stand-trial-for-war-crimes-in-iraq/
Dec 12, 2016 - George W. Bush May Stand Trial For War Crimes In Iraq ... of the US most notable war criminals, such as Henry Kissinger and Barack Obama, ...Obama The War Criminal Butcherer of Women and Children ...
www.paulcraigroberts.org/.../obama-the-war-criminal-butcherer-of-women-and-child...
Jan 11, 2017 - Obama The War Criminal Butcherer of Women and Children Paul Craig Roberts There is no doubt that US President Barak Obama is a war ...Obama the War Criminal, Butcherer of Women and Children
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/.../obama-the-war-criminal-butcherer-of-wome...
Jan 11, 2017 - There is no doubt that US President Barak Obama is a war criminal, as are his military and intelligence officials and most of the House and ...Yemen conflict: US 'could be implicated in war crimes' - BBC News
www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37607248
Oct 10, 2016 - The US could be implicated in potential war crimes in Yemen because of its ... US President Barack Obama agreed to provide "logistical and ...
Could Jared Kushner Be Tried for War Crimes?
Newsweek-May 22, 2017
The Obama administration went ahead with a $1.3 billion arms sale to ... In a piece entitled, “ Will Arms Sales to the Saudis Invite War Crimes ...
Jared Kushner, the Arms Deal, and Alleged Saudi War Crimes
Just Security-May 20, 2017
Jared Kushner, the Arms Deal, and Alleged Saudi War Crimes ... “The Obama administration went ahead with a $1.3 billion arms sale to Saudi ...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/05/30/obama-admin-illegal-spying-worse-than-watergate-glenn-reynolds-column/102284058/
The Obama administration's illegal spying may have been worse than Watergate.
In 1972, some employees of President Nixon’s re-election committee were caught when they broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters to plant a bug. This led to Nixon’s resignation and probably would have led to his felony prosecution had he not been pardoned by his successor, Gerald Ford.
But if a single bugging of the political opposition is enough to bring down a presidency — and maybe lead to an unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former president — then what are we to make of the recently unveiled Obama administration program of massively spying on political opponents in violation of clearly established law?
Because that’s what was unveiled last week.
When the FBI wants to wiretap a domestic suspect, it goes to court for a warrant. But when listening in on foreigners, the National Security Agency hoovers up a vast amount of stuff in bulk: Conversations between foreigners, conversations between Americans and foreigners, conversations between Americans who mention foreigners, and sometimes just plain old conversations between Americans.
There are supposed to be strict safeguards on who can access the information, on how it can be used and on protecting American citizens’ privacy — because the NSA is forbidden by law from engaging in domestic spying. These safeguards were ignored wholesale under the Obama administration, and to many Republicans, it is no coincidence that intelligence leaks damaged Democrats' political opponents in the 2016 election.
A report from journalists John Solomon and Sara Carter last week, based on recently declassified documents, exposed what went on. As Solomon and Carter write:
More than 5%, or one out of every 20, searches seeking upstream Internet data on Americans inside the NSA’s so-called Section 702 database violated the safeguards President Obama and his intelligence chiefs vowed to follow in 2011, according to one classified internal report reviewed by Circa. ...The normally supportive court censured administration officials, saying that the failure to disclose the extent of the violations earlier amounted to an “institutional lack of candor,” and that the improper searches constituted a “very serious Fourth Amendment issue,” according to a recently unsealed court document dated April 26.The admitted violations undercut one of the primary defenses that the intelligence community and Obama officials have used in recent weeks to justify their snooping into incidental NSA intercepts about Americans. ... The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard Americans' privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.
As former anti-terrorism prosecutor and national security expert Andrew McCarthy writes in National Review, this is a very serious abuse. And potentially a crime. If such material were leaked to the press for political advantage, that's another crime.
McCarthy observes: “Enabling of domestic spying, contemptuous disregard of court-ordered minimization procedures (procedures the Obama administration itself proposed, then violated), and unlawful disclosure of classified intelligence to feed a media campaign against political adversaries. Quite the Obama legacy.”
POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media
Will the Justice Department investigate and prosecute former Obama officials? It seems hard to imagine. But then, so did Nixon’s resignation, when the Watergate burglary was first discovered.
This debacle also raises serious questions about the viability of our existing “intelligence community.” In the post-World War II era, we gave massive power to the national security apparatus. In part, that power was granted in the belief that professionalism and patriotism would lead people in those agencies to refuse to let their work be used for partisan political purposes.
It now seems apparent that we overestimated the patriotism and professionalism of the people in these agencies, who allowed them to be politically weaponized by the Obama administration. That being true, if we value democracy, can we permit them to exist in their current form?
That’s a decision that President Trump and Congress will have to face. Ironically, they may be afraid to — for fear that intelligence agencies will engage in further targeted political leaks.
Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor and the author of The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself, is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors.
You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @USATOpinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To submit a letter, comment or column, check our submission guidelines
No comments:
Post a Comment