Pope Francis in March 2013
WTC,9/11:Why Does Shroud of Turin Dail To Reveal Jesus' Penis ?
If only U.S.Homeland Secuity's TSA and its Israeli employees' 'high tech' had been around then we'd now know Jesus exact penis size and probably have a 3 D image if his anal cavity even if they weren't quite up to
1980's Seven Eleven video surveillance technology in 2001 to get a video of Egyptian Mohamed Atta and his Saudi,(NOT IRAQI!),pals waving good bye to Menachem Artzmon and the other the Israeli terrorists and money launderers of ICTS International 'guarding' Logan Airporr Boston that day on Septembber 11,2001 as they happily boarded flights 11 and 175 just before crashing into the WTC in NYC........
But what truth can we expect from Zionist Pope Francis and his money laundering pedophile priests anyway when they still claim whirte European 'Jews' are 'Semites' and who is still in denial about his role in the rape and murder of pregnant Argentine women in collusion with the sadistic military officers whose dicks he sucked ?.Yes Pope Francis the blood of each woman drugged and dropped into the Atlantic by those sick murderers is on your hands.
The Vatican should turn over their dirty lying pope to the Argentine government and ask the mother's of Argenina who lost their sons and daughters to decisde his fate.In fact it would still not undo the Catholic Church's his dirty deeds nor bring those poor pregnant women turned into baby machines for the wealthy and the military officers who so brutally torured and murdered them but it would not be too much to ask that all Catholic properties around the world be put on auction and the proceeds given to the families of the victims of that holocaust.And NO white folks aren't 'Semites' Mr. Bergoglio AKA Pope Francis and those who you associate with must be Zionist monsters !
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene-robinson-what-did-pope-francis-do-during-argentinas-dirty-war/2013/03/14/81c5eb30-8ce5-11e2-9f54-f3fdd70acad2_story.html
Bergoglio also told the biographer that he often allowed people sought by the military to hide on church property. In testimony before an official tribunal in 2010, he said he was unaware of the military government’s worst excesses until after the fact. He specifically denied knowing that babies born to pregnant detainees were forcibly taken from their mothers and given to politically connected families for adoption — although there is evidence suggesting he did know about this practice...........
Children of the Dirty War - The New Yorker
www.newyorker.com/.../03/.../120319fa_fact_goldma...
The New Yorker
War criminal and mass murderer Pope Francis' own Catholic Church provided the very land,El Silencio,(The Silence),where innocent Argentinians, particularly pregnant women,could be tortuted raped and murderered in silence'.I can see no reason why he is any better than Adolp'h ERichman except that Zionists love him for
his silence as many thousands of Christians are slaughrtered by them in the Middle East and anyone who doesn't like it he labels as 'anti-Semitic'.Ha.:
- DOC]
introduccion.DOC
faculty.washington.edu/ritaw/.../introduccion.DOC
Traducir esta páginaIn ... of Mechanics of the Army, or to the Isla del Silencio, belonging to the church. ... Guzmán (who was proposing a land reform) has long been acknowledged to ...
Did Pope Francis Have a Part in Argentina's "Dirty War"? | TIME.com
world.time.com/.../the-new-pope-and-argentinas-dis...
Traducir esta página
.............
Jethro Tull - Hymn 43 (Lyrics) - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v...
YouTubeAug 13, 2011 - Uploaded by IMieiLiveOh Jesus save me! If Jesus saves, well, He'd better save Himself... Jethro Tull - Locomotive Breath ...
Oh father high in heaven,
smile down upon your son
whose busy with his money games,
his women and his gun
Oh Jesus save me!
And the unsung Western hero killed an Indian or three
and made his name in Hollywood
to set the white man free
Oh Jesus save me!
If Jesus saves, well, He'd better save Himself
from the gory glory seekers who use His name in death
Oh Jesus save me!
If Jesus saves, well, He'd better save Himself
from the gory glory seekers who use His name in death
Oh Jesus save me!
I saw him in the city and on the mountains of the moon
His cross was rather bloody
He could hardly roll His stone
Oh Jesus save me!
http://paranormal.about.com/od/religiousmysteriesmiracle/a/Why-The-Shroud-Of-Turin-Is-Fake.htm
Why the Shroud of Turin is Fake
A casual observation and a simple experiment can show that the shroud is quite probably a painting
I have my own theory for why the much-revered and highly controversial Shroud of Turin is not the burial cloth of Jesus - or anyone else for that matter. The most casual observation of the full shroud shows, in my opinion, that it is almost certainly the work of an artist.Now I am not an expert in forensics, medieval art, or even the New Testaments, but I don't need to be for this particular theory. I just need to be a guy with an ordinary body, just as Jesus is thought to have been in life.
I made this observation many years ago, the first time I saw a photo of the shroud that shows the full length of the body. One of my first reactions was along the lines of, "Wow... Good thing his hands are covering his private area." It would certainly embarrass many people if the shroud revealed the full nakedness of the man they think is Jesus - privates and all. He was fully human during his lifetime, but we needn't see his genitals.
And I think that was exactly the artist's intention when he made this clever painting. Out of respect for person who many believe to be the Son of God and the Savior of all Mankind, the artist discreetly covered the genital area. Otherwise, the shroud - which might have been created as an intentional hoax - might not get the sought-after attention. An image showing the privates of Jesus probably would have been locked away in the Vatican a long time ago. (Pope Julius II grudgingly allowed Michelangelo to paint a naked Adam on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.)
AN EXPERIMENT TO TRY
I know what you're thinking: "That's just the way his body and arms were positioned when he was laid in his tomb."
I think not. And you can perform your own little experiment to demonstrate why not.
Lie on your back on a hard surface (such as the floor) as the figure is in the image, and just try to cover your privates with your hands. I am a person of average proportions and I had to stretch my arms with some effort to be able to barely cover them. Yet the figure in the shroud image seems to be accomplishing this with relaxed ease. The arms don't appear to be stretched out at all.
Now just relax your arms to the floor, like a corpse, and see where your relaxed hands cross on your body. For me, they don't cross at all. My fingertips barely cross around my navel - well above the private area. To be able to cross them at all in this position, I have to lift my arms somewhat off the floor, and they still to not reach the private area with any degree of relaxation. And no one is more relaxed than a corpse.
A tall man with very long arms might have a better chance of duplicating this image (hey, really tall guys out there, give it a try), but the figure on the shroud has been measured at 5 ft. 7 in. tall - about the height of an average man today.
Now unless the person in this image had disproportionately long arms, what we see is impossible. But not for the artist who painted the image with the proper respect for this revered man.
Could it be that the people who laid the body in the tomb purposely stretched out the body's arms to cover the genitals and somehow fastened them there before coving it with the shroud? Why would they do that? What would be the purpose? Answer: they wouldn't. And again, the arms do not look stretched out.
The legs also do not look relaxed like those of a dead body would be. Again, try it for yourself. In this highly relaxed state, the legs do not stay tightly together like those in the image; they naturally spread apart somewhat as the feet fall to either side. They would stay together if they were bound, but there seems to be no evidence of that in the image.
.............................
In regards to the title below,'Was Jesus part Ape?',it would not be an insult to Jesus. if he ever existed, or any other human being.There are many reasons to believe that chimpanzees and other apes and monkeys who are we are at present visiting a holocaust upon, are in fact superior to that dirty mass murdering ape, the homo sapien, who is spoiling not only his and her own nest but that of myriad other species.And in doing so we are bringing a holocaust upon ourselves.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?140348-Was-Jesus-part-Ape-Shroud-of-Turin-Story
Was Jesus part Ape? Shroud of Turin Story.
via TowlerRoad |
A fully erect crucifix in an Oklahomo--I mean Oklahoma--church is getting extreme reactions from parishioners (some of whom have become ex parishioners).
This thing puts the "erection" back in resurrection.
It proves that Christ may have been nailed, but honey, he could easily have nailed you too.
The man was HUNG!
But wait a minute! The church's Reverend swears that's not a penis at all, it's actually extended abs!
Hmm, maybe. But Jesus' six-pack sure looks like 8
.........................
http://www.skepdic.com/shroud.html
The "shroud" of Turin is a woven cloth about 14 feet long and 3.5 feet wide with an image of a man on it. Actually, it has two images, one frontal and one rear, with the heads meeting in the middle. It has been noted that if the shroud were really wrapped over a body there should be a space where the two heads meet. It has also been noted that there is a space where the front and back of the head meet, and that what appears to be the outline of the back of the head is a water stain. Some have noted that the head is 5% too large for its body, the nose is disproportionate, and the arms are too long. Others deny these claims. In any case, the image is believed by many to be a negative image of the crucified Jesus and the shroud is believed to be his burial shroud. Most skeptics think the image is not a burial shroud, but a painting and a pious hoax. The shroud is kept in the cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, Italy.
Apparently, the first historical mention of the shroud as the "shroud of Turin" is in the late 16th century when it was brought to the cathedral in that city, though it was allegedly discovered in Turkey during one of the so-called "Holy" Crusades in the so-called "Middle" Ages. In 1988, the Vatican allowed the shroud to be dated by three independent sources--Oxford University, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology--and each of them dated the cloth as originating in medieval times, around 1350....................
........................
http://www.shroud.com/bar.htm
Debunking The Shroud: Made by Human Hands
(Editor's Note: I am very pleased to make this collection of articles and letters available on this website and wish to thank the following organizations and individuals for granting permission to reprint their materials: the Biblical Archaeology Society and Bridget Young, its Executive Director, Gary Vikan, Walter C. McCrone, Prof. Daniel Scavone, Prof. Karlheinz Dietz, John Markwardt, Mario Latendresse, Rev. Albert Dreisbach, Mark Guscin, Joseph Marino, Emanuela Marinelli, Gino Zaninotto, Dr. Stephen Mattingly and Dr. Alan Whanger). I would also like to thank Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez for sending me the issue of BAR with the Shroud article last November and encouraging me to act on it.
Click on the links below to go directly to the section of your choice or scroll down the page in the usual manner.Table of Contents:
Debunking The Shroud: Made by Human Hands by Gary Vikan - Original Article reprinted from Biblical Archaeology Review
The Shroud Painting Explained by Walter C. McCrone - Sidebar to Original Article
Letters to the Editor - Reader responses published by Biblical Archaeology Review
Deconstructing the "Debunking" of the Shroud by Daniel Scavone and an international group of researchers - Previously unpublished responses to the article
Comments on the Radiocarbon Dating of the Turin Shroud by Dr. Stephen Mattingly - Previously unpublished response to the article
"A Letter to Hershel Shanks, Editor of BAR" by Dr. Alan Whanger - Previously unpublished response to the article
........................
Catholics and Fundies Attack Chocolate Jesus:
1 - Sweet Jesus: The Astounding Story of the Chocolate Christ
likeobscurevainefforts.com/sweetjesus.html
Chocolate Jesus Penis Stolen, Display Canceled
www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/printer_04017002_11_sweetjesus.shtml
Chocolate Penis Idol Jesus Catholics Islam Religion - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd0d4CuUewI
YouTube
All comments on Chocolate Penis Idol Jesus Catholics Islam ...
www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=sd0d4CuUewI
YouTube...
"Sweet Jesus" in Chocolate, and Child Slavery in the Chocolate ...
www.renewedpriesthood.org/ca/page.cfm?Web_ID=921
Catholics angry over naked chocolate Jesus - Heathen Hangout
www.heathen-hangout.com › ... › Atheism, Religion, Philosophy
Mar 30, 2007 - 25 posts - 14 authorsCatholics angry over naked chocolate Jesus Atheism, Religion, Philosophy. ... I've never had a chocolate penis offered to me, either. I'm quite ...
Chocolate Jesus | Dirty Laundry
marcys.wordpress.com/tag/chocolate-jesus/
THE CATHOLIC CHRUCH AND THE CHOCOLATE JESUS FACTORY
gary2idaho.wordpress.com/.../the-catholic-chruch-and-the-chocolate-jes...
Chocolate Jesus Offends Weirdos - HecklerSpray
www.hecklerspray.com/chocolate-jesus-offends-weirdos/20077734.phpMar 25, 2009 - But word of the confectionary Christ infuriated Catholics, including Egan, who ... But perhaps it isn't the chocolate Jesus' penis that's causing so ...
......................................
Urban Dictionary: jesus penis
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...jesus%20pe...
Urban Dictionary
Christians Super Pissed about Possible Jesus Penis - Gawker
gawker.com/.../christians-super-pissed-about-possible-j...Apr 16, 2010 - Is that a distended abdomen, or are You just happy to see me, Lord? Oklahoma churchgoers are not very pleased with a new crucifix that ...
Gawker
Jesus' foreskin - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Jesus'_foreskin
Uncyclopedia
How big was Jesus's penis? - Yahoo Answers
Jesus Penis Is Causing Pandemonium in Oklahoma!
blogs.villagevoice.com/.../2010/.../jesus_penis_is.ph...
The Village Voice
Circumcision of Jesus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_of_Jesus
Wikipedia
Jesus Penis - Huffington Post
www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/jesus-penis
The Huffington Post...
Keep your Jesus off my Penis - Atheists of Silicon Valley
www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/JesusPenis.htm
Pope Francis and the Naked Christ : The New Yorker
www.newyorker.com/.../pope-francis-and-the-naked-chr...
The New Yorker
Jesus's Penises! | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/CockoftheAlmighty
...
No comments:
Post a Comment