Two pro Israel Zionists ,Bill Sherlach and Nicole Hockley,who have hoovered on and around the Sabdy Hook incident frolm the get go - one,Bill Sherlach , claiming to have lost his psychologist wife to Adam Lanza and the other ,British corporate whore Nicole Hockley,who mysteriously moved to Sandy Hook with husband and claums to have lost a son to Adam Lanza whose father Peter Lanza is part of the pro Zionist military industrial corporate elite of GE moneylaundering arm GE Capital.
Not to forget Jewsh Zionist whore Veronique Pozner who may have worked on U.N. international anti-gun lobbying even though Israel nor Switzerland restrucyts guns among its own citizens.She has raised money
based upon lie that her son Noah died at Sandy Hook and claiming that she showed Governor Malloy the body.Yet she and her U.S.anti-gun lobbyists of Sandy Hook have totally subverted the public's right to know in order to be informed.Carlee Soto alleged sister of dead teacher Vickie Soto claims to have access to and ownership of certain unnnamed dead students,(although strangely she never mentions having photos of her suster's body and left the phoney grave unfinished while promoting personal donations for herself and who is also part of Barack 'Hollow Pont Bullets' Obama's 'anti-gun' lobby.
No Sandy Hook Children Died, Part II | NODISINFO
nodisinfo.com/Home/no-children-died-part-ii/
Apr 3, 2013 - Through their Sandy Hook fraud evil Zionists are trying to scare the ... It is a certainty that they didn't die at the hands of Adam Lanza on ... The primary child pictured is Dylan Hockley, purportedly the son of ... Furthermore, their eyes are aimed in different directions. .... Sandy Hook – the Nancy Lanza Hoax.Carlee Soto,Victoria Soto,Emilie Parker Frank,Sandy Hook ...
wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.com/2013/07/victoria-sotosandy-hook.html
by Tony Ryals
Jul 21, 2013 - It should be noted that while her alleged sister Carlee Soto claims to have photos of the dead children of Sandy Hook which may be against the law in light of Connecticut's draconian new law written just for the Sandy Hook ...Sandy Hook families: Don't release 911 tapes
Waterbury Republican American-15 hours ago
HARTFORD (AP) Two relatives of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre are telling members of a Connecticut panel they don't want the ...
Brendan Sharkey: Why we blocked access to photos of Sandy Hook ...
New Haven Register-Nov 1, 2013
Bill Sherlach, left, husband of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victim Mary Sherlach, and Nicole Hockley, mother of victim Dylan ...
Danbury News Times-Oct 31, 2013
In this image taken from video and provided by WABC-TV, a backhoe digs through the rubble as the demolition of Sandy Hook Elementary ...
...............................
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/16789-what-do-sandy-hook-investigators-have-to-hide
Wednesday, 23 October 2013 10:08
What Do Sandy Hook Investigators Have to Hide?
More than 10 months after Adam Lanza massacred 26 students and
faculty and committed suicide at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown,
Connecticut, questions still abound in the midst of conspiracy theories
and prolonged speculation. The October 21 edition of The Hartford Courant, which has been following the story closely since the mass murder last December 14, ran an editorial
complaining about State Attorney Stephen Sedensky's delay in releasing
the full investigative report, originally expected by the end of June.
In the meantime, says the Courant, details continue to leak, feeding "the sick conspiracy mill and prolong[ing] the pain."
But the editorial admits Sedensky's stonewall is prompting a host of relevant questions. What have investigators found that prevents publication? Can investigators explain what prompted Adam Lanza's murderous actions?
Along with the delayed report, other circumstances add to general mistrust. Why is the school building being demolished, access to the site closed to the public, and even photos and videos banned? The Courant continues:
Perhaps most important are the results of Lanza's toxicology tests, conducted by the Connecticut medical examiner in the weeks after the shooting to check for the presence of drugs in his system. The medical examiner released Lanza's autopsy findings, which showed nothing of note, less than one month after the rampage, but what of the drug test results?
In May, the Huffington Post reported that Lanza's toxicology tests showed no evidence of alcohol or drugs, illegal or prescription. However, the Post was not reporting official test results. Instead, this news was revealed by an "official close to the investigation" who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was "not authorized to publicly disclose the information." The report also stated that warrants revealed no evidence of drugs or medications at the Lanza home, though authorities found "medical, psychiatric and prescription records" there. Unsurprisingly, the contents of these documents remain undisclosed.
However, it appears Huffington's source may have been mistaken. The parent advocacy group AbleChild has been battling for months to obtain Lanza's psychiatric drug history. During a recent Freedom of Information Act hearing in the case AbleChild vs. Chief Medical Examiner, Connecticut attorney Patrick B. Kwanashie argued against releasing the toxicology test records because they could "cause a lot of people to stop taking their medications — stop cooperating with their treating physicians just because of the heinousness of what Adam Lanza did."
Kwanashie opined that AbleChild is requesting the information for illegitimate reasons. "Even if you can conclusively establish that Adam Lanza — his murderous actions — were caused by antidepressants, you can't logically from that conclude that you know others would commit the same actions as a result of taking antidepressants."
On the contrary, AbleChild argues that release of the results will promote informed consent and public health. Patricia Weathers, co-founder of AbleChild, lamented, "This opposition comes despite the fact that 31 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 162 wounded and 72 killed," with no federal investigation into the link between psychiatric drugs and such violence. If psychiatric drugs are indeed strongly linked to such violence, this could challenge the federal government's narrative that guns are the problem and more gun control is the solution. Perhaps this explains the stonewalling of the investigation.
But the editorial admits Sedensky's stonewall is prompting a host of relevant questions. What have investigators found that prevents publication? Can investigators explain what prompted Adam Lanza's murderous actions?
Along with the delayed report, other circumstances add to general mistrust. Why is the school building being demolished, access to the site closed to the public, and even photos and videos banned? The Courant continues:
Also raising suspicions are the
confidentiality agreements that workers at the elementary school are
being required to sign. They are tearing down the school to make way for
a new one, a move The Courant supports. But pledging workers
to secrecy about what they see is excessive and unlikely to succeed. At
this rate the school may be razed before the report is out. What if the
document raises questions about the building?
Then there is the subject of the 911 calls. On September 30, the Los Angeles Times
reported that Sedensky is appealing the Connecticut Freedom of
Information Commission's order to release the 911 recordings from the
school shooting. Sedensky petitions for "sensitivity toward victims'
families." Yet the Times notes, "The secrecy is striking in
light of the quick release of information — from 911 recordings to
pictures and video — in other notorious crimes."Perhaps most important are the results of Lanza's toxicology tests, conducted by the Connecticut medical examiner in the weeks after the shooting to check for the presence of drugs in his system. The medical examiner released Lanza's autopsy findings, which showed nothing of note, less than one month after the rampage, but what of the drug test results?
In May, the Huffington Post reported that Lanza's toxicology tests showed no evidence of alcohol or drugs, illegal or prescription. However, the Post was not reporting official test results. Instead, this news was revealed by an "official close to the investigation" who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was "not authorized to publicly disclose the information." The report also stated that warrants revealed no evidence of drugs or medications at the Lanza home, though authorities found "medical, psychiatric and prescription records" there. Unsurprisingly, the contents of these documents remain undisclosed.
However, it appears Huffington's source may have been mistaken. The parent advocacy group AbleChild has been battling for months to obtain Lanza's psychiatric drug history. During a recent Freedom of Information Act hearing in the case AbleChild vs. Chief Medical Examiner, Connecticut attorney Patrick B. Kwanashie argued against releasing the toxicology test records because they could "cause a lot of people to stop taking their medications — stop cooperating with their treating physicians just because of the heinousness of what Adam Lanza did."
Kwanashie opined that AbleChild is requesting the information for illegitimate reasons. "Even if you can conclusively establish that Adam Lanza — his murderous actions — were caused by antidepressants, you can't logically from that conclude that you know others would commit the same actions as a result of taking antidepressants."
On the contrary, AbleChild argues that release of the results will promote informed consent and public health. Patricia Weathers, co-founder of AbleChild, lamented, "This opposition comes despite the fact that 31 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 162 wounded and 72 killed," with no federal investigation into the link between psychiatric drugs and such violence. If psychiatric drugs are indeed strongly linked to such violence, this could challenge the federal government's narrative that guns are the problem and more gun control is the solution. Perhaps this explains the stonewalling of the investigation.
comment
Thursday, 24 October 2013 14:58 posted by Jack Williams Just goes to show you- These investigations should not be left to the government. These crimes scenes should never be controlled by the government. They should be secured and controlled by the citizenry and independent investigators. These investigations should be conducted by independent CSI organizations and concerned citizens
No comments:
Post a Comment