Boston Marathon FBI Cover Up Just Like Sandy Hook Cover Up,Both With Heavy Jewish-Zionist Precence
Title of one of Zionist ex California Democrat Representative Jane Harmon's pro-Israel thedailybeast.com digital rag propaganda pieces after Boston Marathon 'bombing'.:
Should Americans Identify With Israel After Boston?
by Sigal Samuel Apr 23, 2013
On September 11, 2001, Benjamin Netanyahu told the press that the day’s attacks would likely heighten American sympathy for Israel by giving the U.S. a taste of global terrorism. As the New York Times reported:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''..........
.................
Sandy Hook: The Israeli Connections Keep Stacking Up - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8XinFh340w
Jan 7, 2013 - Uploaded by eyesonthedemise2
For 20 days now the light of truth has been shining over this complete hoax that we now know as Sandy Hook ...Israeli police head to US to aid in Boston Marathon bombing - RT.com
rt.com/usa/police-israel-investigation-boston-009/
http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/11/04/monday-morning-skeptic-in-boston-bombing-fbi-fights-for-publics-right-to-know-nothing/
Monday Morning Skeptic: In Boston Bombing, FBI Fights for Public’s Right to Know… Nothing
By James Henry on Nov 4, 2013
FBI Director, James B. Comey
Is the FBI conducting an honest investigation or working diligently on a cover-up? It’s impossible to know.
But the Bureau’s silence should be a red flag, since the FBI and other secretive U.S. agencies have a well-known record of duplicity when left to operate in the shadows.
Secrecy has become the rule. In Boston, the prosecutor of accused bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has asked the judge to withhold filings from the media. The FBI won’t even identify the agent who shot and killed a key witness in the investigation in Orlando, Florida, let alone clear up the muddy circumstances around the shooting. And the Bureau has ordered the sealing of a county coroner’s completed autopsy report of that killing.
And it’s not only the media that is being stonewalled. Politicians are being shut out, as well.
U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, a reliably conservative Republican from Iowa, is now demanding answers from the FBI about its bombing investigation. In a letter to bureau Director James Comey, Grassley criticized the FBI’s lack of transparency and asked for answers to a series of questions about the bombing he first asked in June.
Three months ago, U.S. Rep. William Keating, a Massachusetts Democrat, asked his own questions in a scathing letter to Comey.
Favored Reporters Are Fed Leaks
The information blackout of the past six months stands in stark contrast to the FBI’s river of leaks to pet reporters during the week following the April 15 bombing.
This tactic of handing out selective “scoops” gave the FBI control of the narrative as it steered public opinion toward viewing the Boston Bombing as an open-and-shut case against the Tsarnaev brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar.
As part of the quid pro quo for these scoops, favored journalists are not likely to press the government for answers to discomfiting questions.
But don’t take our word for it.
CBS News correspondent John Miller enjoys most-favored-journalist status as a former flack for the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. He explained the scoops-for-softballs system in an interview with David Bauder of the Associated Press.
“I am reluctant to criticize
authorities,” Miller said. “My interpretation of when they need to be
(criticized) and somebody else’s might be different…If you’ve been there
and you know how that works and what it’s like, and how easy it is to
take potshots from the outside, your criticism is more measured, your
analysis of what is worthy of criticism and what isn’t is slightly
different.”
Our Pursuit of a Police ReportAccording to the official narrative, the Tsarnaev brothers were “self-radicalized” Muslims who hatched the bomb plot unassisted, constructed rather sophisticated bombs on their own, killed university police Officer Sean Collier for his gun (which they somehow did not take), and carjacked the still-anonymous “Danny” (who either escaped or was let go).
And in order to catch the Tsarnaevs, the Boston region was in essence locked down under martial law.
In scrutinizing the prevailing narrative, WhoWhatWhy has found it instructive to follow one of the many loose threads.
We sought a copy of a Cambridge, Massachusetts police report related to the “Danny” carjacking in Cambridge on the night the Tsarnaev brothers were revealed as suspects. We hoped to clear up some conflicting information.
We know the report exists. The Wall Street Journal published a story based on the document. The reporter, Pervaiz Shallwani, claims to have been given access to the official document.
Police incident reports are considered public information. Since the report had already been released to a Wall Street Journal reporter, we thought it would be a simple matter to get a copy for WhoWhatWhy.
Report Withheld; ‘Ongoing Investigation’
We called Daniel Riviello, a Cambridge police communications specialist, to ask for the report. He replied that he would have to find out whether it was available for release.
Later that day, he replied by email that the report was being withheld under an exemption of the Massachusetts Public Records Law because it was part of an ongoing investigation.
That’s a broad exemption. It is hard to conceive of a fresh police report that is not part of an ongoing investigation.
We pointed out to Riviello that the report already had been released to the Wall Street Journal, and we sent him a link to the story. We asked him to explain what had changed in the release status of the police report since that reporter was given access.
Riviello replied by email:
I do not know how the Wall Street Journal
(reportedly) obtained a copy of the report in question as it was not
released by my office. My office is responsible for all releases to the
media and this report was not released to the WSJ or any other outlets.
So we called Journal reporter Shallwani. He said he got the report
from “a law enforcement source,” although he would not elaborate. He
said the narrative section of the report included the name of the police
officer who interviewed “Danny,” but the carjacking victim’s real name
was blacked out.Later, Cambridge police said the report had been forwarded to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston, which is prosecuting the bombing case. We contacted Christina Dilorio-Sterling, the prosecutor’s spokeswoman, many times. She hasn’t replied.
‘Wide Swaths of Records Omitted’
WhoWhatWhy and the two skeptical politicians are not alone in wondering why law enforcement agencies are refusing to allow access to information about the Boston Marathon bombing.
Gatehouse Media, which publishes the Quincy Patriot Ledger, the Fall River Herald News and other papers in the Boston area, complained in a letter to the federal district court in Boston about the unprecedented lock on information about the bombing investigation.
Gatehouse alleges violations of the public’s constitutionally guaranteed right to scrutinize legal proceedings. The Herald News reported in late August that 48 entries were missing from the court file related to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, which the publisher says is a violation of the First Amendment.
The article quoted from the letter:
Wide swaths of court records have been
omitted in their entirety from the docket listings. The incomplete
public docket sheet maintained in this case … does not accurately
reflect the materials on file with the Court. As a result, the
Newspapers’ constitutionally protected newsgathering and reporting
efforts have been frustrated.
The fact that the circumstances
culminating in Mr. Tsarnaev’s arrest and the charges against him have
received extensive media attention is simply not enough to seal
allegedly prejudicial information, (attorney Michael) Grygiel said,
arguing that the high-profile nature of the case requires more
transparency, not less, because justice must not only be done, it must
be perceived as being done.
And, it turns out, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense team is facing the same obstacles.A motion filed in court by the defense team lists numerous requests for exculpatory information that have either been denied or provided incompletely during discovery.............
.......
The Jewish Press » » Israel Hi-Tech Firm Helped Capture Boston ...
www.jewishpress.com › News & Views › Global
Israeli team helps survivors of Boston Marathon attack - Metro - The ...
www.bostonglobe.com/.../israel...boston...boston-marathon.../sto...
May 10, 2013 - When Kara Conceison learned that her hometown was on lockdown as a Boston Marathon bombing suspect was on the run, the Watertown ...Israeli police head to US to aid in Boston Marathon bombing - RT.com
rt.com/usa/police-israel-investigation-boston-009/
Israeli Doctors Treats Victims of Boston Marathon Terror Attack ...
unitedwithisrael.org/israeli-doctors-treats-victims-of-boston-marathon-ter...
Israeli medical experience influential in Boston response to ...
pri.org/.../israeli-medical-experience-influential-boston-response-marath...
No comments:
Post a Comment