two 'dead' Sandy Hook,Newtown,CT. child 'actors' ?
If truE this should be VERY good news for the grieving parents and they can all close down their fund raising websites and return money with apologies to those who were deceived into sending donations !
- jesselewismemorialfund.com/Spreading Jesse's Message of Courage & Love Through Education and Good Works.
- jesselewismemorialfund.com/photos/Spreading Jesse's Message of Courage & Love Through Education and Good Works.
- jesselewismemorialfund.com/ways-to-give/In addition to donating directly to the Lewis family at the left, these are organizations that the family follows and supports...............................................http://theme.wordpress.com/credits/jesselewismemorialfund.com/
Jan 8, 2013 - Uploaded by ASAFunnyThe girl shown in the picture with Obama is her sister Madeline. ..... Sandy Hook Hoax Part 1 "Victims" Emilie ...
Sandy Hook — 04 February 2013
What is a living, breathing Jesse Lewis doing in the Obama photo? The implications are astounding. It means the entire Sandy Hook event was a diabolical hoax.
How stupid they are that they didn’t think people would see it. It’s almost like a kind of arrogance, “No one will notice. Let’s get these photos up to pull their emotional strings. It will make the President look good.” Thanks to a savvy Internet video poster, Jeremy Feit, who broke the case in the video linked, here (references), it was first noticed that this is no everyday boy standing at the President’s side. Rather, it is none other than the purportedly deceased Jesse Lewis, the one who bravely ran out of Victoria Soto’s fictional classroom and was reportedly shot dead. “If he only would have stayed put,” said his forlorn father, Neil Heslin, “but that’s my Jesse.” What a lie.
Neil Heslin is also presiding over the donations. He did say that Jesse said this would be the best Christmas ever. Was that a kind of subliminal utterance by Heslin, since, now, he and his son would be enriched by countless thousands?
The lie is now proven categorically. This is Jesse Lewis of the Sandy Hook massacre fame. Here, he is spotted in the Obama after-action pictures, taken on Sunday, December 16, 2012, two days after the event. The meeting was announced in advance and extensively publicized. Local news networks let the community know, like the Hearst mouth piece the Connecticut Post:
Then, there was this notable article by ABC’s Good Morning America:
That would have included one Jesse Lewis, son of Neil Heslin. Yet, since he is proven alive, then, these would be “lie-papers,” not newspapers.
These photos with the President were taken by the major media. They are not photoshopped; they are absolutely real and have been confirmed officially. Sources for these photos include ABC and Gawker:
In addition to the above photo and caption here is a screenshot enlargement, though low resolution, of the same pose taken from a different angle:
Yet, it is one thing to be adamant about an issue such as the recognition of Lewis by a mere photo. It is quite another when it can be proven categorically. If that can be done, this makes the entire claim of a Sandy Hook schoolyard massacre a fraud. That can surely be done by a careful analysis. Here is a crystal-clear version of a slightly younger Jesse Lewis:
The above is a certified image of Jesse Lewis. Notice the following:
- the downturned corner of the right eye, towards the outer edge
- the downward curving of the eyebrows, most dramatic on the right
- the typical straight, downward curving of the bangs
- the tendency for the eyes to quickly become narrow laterally, an almost tear drop formation
- the wide flaring of the nostrils in a lateral direction
- relatively wide bridge of the nose, especially between the eyebrows
- a slight pug tip of the nose
- gaps in the teeth between the upper incisors
- lower lip is prominently thicker than the upper, especially in the middle
- face is broader at the temples than elsewhere
- relatively low crown of the head but pointed on top just to the right of midline
- relatively bulbous ear lobes
- nearly vertical smile line on the left
- slightly protuberant chin; dimple more prominent on the left
- prominent brow (just above the top eyebrows, seemingly more prominent on the left
- a particularly obvious increase in the intensity of the discoloration under the eyes on the right in the right corner of the eye; color is a purplish-red
- tendency of the bangs to drop downward in the center of the forehead
- another obvious feature, which is the upward pointing on the crown of the head, right in the center line
As is said in Hollywood detective scenes, “It’s him; It’s him!” So, now, without doubt, the Obama child and the bullet-hole-ridden Jessie Lewis are the same. There isn’t even an iota of question otherwise.
However, just in case, let’s view the most telling feature of his face: those eyes.
Raindrops did not fall from the operatives’ faces, but, when looking into eyes such as these, countless good, decent people all over the world shed countless tears. Let them turn those emotions into righteous rage. Those tear drop eyes, highly unusual, do not lie. Nor do those congestion lesions under the eyes. Nor do those bangs or the downturned the eyebrows. Nor does the fact, and this is significant, that Jessie Lewis’ right eye is closer to the bridge of the nose than the left one, visible in both close-ups.
There is one more key, definitive feature of this individual that is indisputable. Did anyone notice? It’s the whites of the eyes. In all photos when looking straight-on Jessie Lewis has a predominance of white color (sclera) of the eyes in the left portion medial to the left iris, with a much tinier portion in the right eye (possibly natural defect, possibly a kind of astigmatism). Here is a close-up of the admitted Jessie Lewis from ‘family’ photos on the Zuckerberg site:
AMITTED JESSE LEWIS, FACEBOOK
DISGUISED (with president) JESSE LEWIS, SAID NOT TO BE HIM BY THE MOSSAD
Bingo: a 1000% match.
Obfuscation by overseas operatives?
So, what is the Zionist connection? When this was realized, that astute individuals recognized Jessie Lewis in the presidential photo-op, a cover-up ensued. This was attempted by no less than the Israeli Mossad. It was an individual named (alias) Mick West who posted, aggressively, on his Website MegaDebunk.org, the following in response to those who brought to bear Jessie’s presence with Obama. Here is the finding on Google when searching for the site:
Here is what is found when the link is clicked:
West had circled Jesse’s head for emphasis, fraudulently identifying him in this manner. This caused great confusion can caused many people to drop the issue. Of course, West provides not documentation for his source.
Here is a picture of West with caption (by this author):
The fact that he is an operative is made clear throughout his posts. Here is one telling example, the post dated January, 2013, being an attempt to run cover for the Zionist perpetration of 911:
His entire role seems to run cover for various criminal acts committed by Zionist operatives throughout the world, including those who perpetrated Sandy Hook.
Source of photo and thread: http://metabunk.org/threads/1076-Debunked-Jesse-Lewis-in-Obama-Photo-after-Sandy-Hook or http://metabunk.org/threads/1076-Debunked-Jesse-Lewis-in-Obama-Photo-after-Sandy-Hook?s=45c8ad47fde1c5bcef117f65db038a07
Is, then, Jesse’s father, Neil Heslin, one such operative? The Mossad is micro-managing his image.
It is now time for Mr. Heslin to speak the truth instead of brow-beating the world about gun rights.
He surely knows the truth about the nature of his son. According to ABC News Obama met specifically with the parents of fallen sons, who had purportedly met with Obama (see Huffington Post article, here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/obama-newtown-victims_n_2313177.html. In the back of the Obama photo file a person is spotted. Is this Neil Heslin hiding in the back against the wall? This man has a prominent brow and forehead creases, but appears to sport a goatee.
Did Heslin have a goatee? Did he shave it? Was that him hunkered down against the wall?
Here is the caption found at the base of the photos: “My mom would be SO proud to see President Obama holding her granddaughter. But not as proud as I am of her. http://pic.twitter.com/YDU88x3O Photo by Cristina Hassinger” Thus, no matter, he was there somewhere. Note: the comment and photo upload by Hassinger demonstrates that she is also a culprit.
Here is the article confirming the “Obama/Fathers” connection: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/obama-newtown-victims_n_2313177.html
Even so, despite the apparent facial hair (or shadow) do the eyes and nose lie:
Man with Obama
Heslin at the anti-gun conference
It’s a close call, but the distance between the eyes and the bridge of the nose are similar, as are the lines in the forehead.
Leaving no room for doubt: further analysis
Here are the primary pictures of Lewis available. Let us take a careful look to determine which ones are real and which are fake:
The above picture on the right may well be real; the lighting from the flash is uniform. There is no anatomy missing. Notice the tell-tale features found in the Obama photograph, which include the tear drop-shaped eyes, the wide upper bridge of the nose, and the downward turning of the right eye edge, and the gaps between the front and second incisors. There is also that obvious fullness of the lower lip compared to the upper and the low position of the ears. The chin and jaw lines are precisely the same. These cannot be hidden or faked and are categorical proof of the scam. Here is the picture next to the Obama one:
When compared and contrasted, it is more undeniable proof.
Who is Jesse Lewis, and who are his parents? Mr. Heslin seems real and does bear resemblance. What about his mother, Scarlet Lewis, who is also a heavy hitter for gun control. Is she really his mother? Here she is, front and center, at the Sandy Hook gun grubbing conference:
Any resemblance to Lewis? Actually, there is none. However, she could easily debunk these claims by providing evidence, like documents or even family pictures. Instead, the following is what she provided. What about the picture below? Is there any proof that Scarlet Lewis is really the mother? Could she be a grade-B actress instead garnering mere monetary gain for her acts?
This is a grotesque attempt at photoshopping. Look at the light. It is aimed directly at Ms. Lewis, straight to her face and a bit above, see the flash mark in the distance behind. There is a relection of light in her eyes, the boy’s eyes, and in both their cheeks, mouths and hair; it’s strikingly obvious. In her companion, likely her real son, the reflection can even be seen as circular reflections in his irises. What about the boy in red, purportedly Jessee? His eyes are entirely dull: there is no flash-reflection in them in the least. The face has no reflection, nor does the torso, hand, or neck. A fully contrived, the head is massive and freakish, with that typical Photoshop-induced grin. However, the greatest finding relates directly to the cut-and-paste. Look on the left relative to light shadow (cut-line): the ear is missing.
Let’s look at that finding (just now seen, as this article is being prepared) more closely:
There’s no left ear. Even the right ear is suspect. They cut a part of it off with the ‘knife.’ They also apparently touched up the congestion signs under the eyes.
Even so, is there anything in this sterile photo that bears even the slightest resemblance to Jesse Lewis:
It is truly Jesse’s head, it is just that it has been shopped in, as proven by the lack of reflection of light and the bizarre facies. Look at the eyes. One is dull and cold, while the other is light and lively.
This is also a real picture of Jesse Lewis. Notice, again, the lack of a contrived appearance, the light reflection off the hair and also near the left edge of his shirt. See, too, the tear drop-like eyes, the slight downward slant of the right eye versus the left, the larger lower lip, and the nasal flaring, all of which are unique marks, like a fingerprint.
One more time:
NATURALISTIC (natural light) SYNTHETIC (no natural light)
Notice that there is plenty of light in the foreground AND background in the real photo but only light in the background of the faked one.
Here is another freakish-appearing picture, which, right away, gives reason to call fraud. While the head was likely inserted the culprits left fewer trails, here:
This might have been added to give the impression that the women in the picture is Scarlet Lewis, celebrating his school report card. After all, in eulogizing a son, why give pictures with mere strangers instead of loving family. Yet, is this really Mrs. Lewis in the background? Let’s have a closer look:
An even clear example was found, let’s look, again:
In contrast, Lewis has low methodicalness and no angular eyebrows. It is NOT the same woman.
Then, there is this bizarre picture. There is no possibility that this is real. This is most likely a black and white photo that has been colored in. Both these images have been clearly artificially installed. It bears no resemblance to a real photograph. While there is reflections on the woman’s face, there is none on Jesse’s:
A close inspection proves the case. This is a photoshopped head:
The photoshopper’s lair has been revealed. With one excessive twist of the artifice, Jesse’s head, or, rather, installed face was given too much stretch or torque. Thus, the left corner of the mouth was raised up significantly but more incriminating is the raising up of the ear on one side, while the right ear drops abnormally low: in act, anatomically impossibly low. There are defects all around his head and face. Most dramatic is the sharp angular outcropping into the shirt, a razor-like cut. Close inspection of the left area shows a gagged, tight conformation of the shirt against the ‘neck.’ Regardless, even with a twisted neck (his neck is not, just extended), there is no way that difference in ear position could be this anomalous.
In the same picture there is one more anomaly that defies explanation, as follows:
See the anomaly? It is a thin piece of ‘membrane’, vertically straight and transparent. could be the stroke of a brush: no other explanation.
One more time looking at the ears:
Thus, twisting and turning does not cause the ear to dislocate backward and upward compared to the line angle of the other ear.
Here is another picture of Lewis. Notice the naturalness of the eyes, the glimmer (lack of dullness), the sheen of the hair, and the like striking in a natural way.
What is also consistent are Lewis’ features, which make it indisputably clear that the Jessie Lewis of real life is the same child, alive and well, with President Barack Obama on December 15, 2012.
Here is Jessie with his dad. There is nothing noticeable in this picture that doesn’t conform. The light is perfectly correct. Note, again, that prominent feature in Jesse of those eyes. That is one of the greatest give-aways proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Jesse Lewis of Obama is the same one who the world has presumed dead.
A real child, for once
Jessie Lewis clearly a real person, a child like other children, as this picture demonstrates:
Once again, no matter how many lies are told, no matter how adamantly and repetitively it is repeated in the Zionist-controlled media, there is no way Jesse Lewis could be dead if he was found alive and well a day later: and not just anywhere but, rather, standing right next to the President of the United States among full guard. The case is busted–and busted again–simply by the common people. No thanks to law enforcement.
So, Mr. Heslin must be asked, ”Where is Jessie Lewis, now?” Moreover, Scarlet Lewis, must be asked if, “Are you the real mother of Jessie Lewis, and if so, can you prove it? Moreover, if you are the real mother, why not provide real pictures instead of exclusively fakes?”
To be updated, shortly, K. Khaleel
February 03, 2013
February 03, 2013
February 02, 2013
February 01, 2013
January 31, 2013
January 29, 2013
January 28, 2013
January 28, 2013
January 27, 2013
January 26, 2013