The Saudi terrorists onboard 911 flights lie was probably done by Israeli Zionists in control of U.S. 'security' and phone systemin order to pressure Saudi government to collude and collaborate with 9/11 crime and eventual resulting war cxrimes of bombing and poisoning innocent civilians of Iraq and Afghanistan for the cause of 'greater Israel'.Ironically both thew U.S. and Putin Russia where so many 'white Jews' living in Israel and UK and U.S. originate from are under control of Rothschild-ean Jewish Zionists.It was in fact the very rise of the Rothschilds to power in England under King George and the lie Rothschild agents sent back to England after Wellinton's defeat of Napoleon that Napolean had won causing England's bonds to crash to near nothing in value so that the Rothschilds could by them for pence on the pound before finally printing the news that in fact NAPOLEAN HAD INDEED BEEN DEFEATED.This would have greatly benefitted King George and the government of old England in that their own huge bond debt would have been erased long enough to by back at pence on the pound and turn British and aristocratic English debt into a huge profit on the backs of the 'little people'.This is the legacy we live with even in te U.S. today and that in the end lead to Rothschild funding of international Jewish Zionism and takeover of even the U.S. and founding of Israel that even the Nazias collaborated in doing for the Rothsdchilds and international Jewish bankers.
Whether Barbara Olsen was Jdewish or not her attendance at Yeshiva University which also was in and around the Sandy Hook Elementary Newtown CT. MYSTERY AS WELL AND HAD SUCH FACULTY AS PENTAGON MULTI TRILLION DOLLAR THEIF RABBI DOV ZAKHEIM AS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR SHOWS IT IS A CENTER OF ZIONIST CRIMINALS WHO HAVE DONE GRWEAT DAMAGE AND TREASON AGAINST AMERICA AND ALL AMERICANS AND ARE EQUALLY GUILTY OF ALL WAR CRIMES COMMITTED ON THE BASIS OF 9/11 LIES EVER SINCE!
Barbara Olson (ted Olson) Research - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=16224
Feb 1, 2009 - 17 posts - 9 authors
"Theodore Olson's wife, Barbara Olson, Calls From Flight 77 Married to ... TheodoreOlson, a close aide and friend of President George W Bush, she ..... She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not ...
Dov Zakheim was an adjunct professor at Yeshiva University. IMHO - Barbara was a true believer who was recruited to play a key role in creating the 9/11 Myth. - pilotsfor911truth.org
9-11 Pentagon missing $2.3 trillion Rumsfeld Exposed 9/10 ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-F5NKAMdFc
Sep 10, 2012 - Uploaded by Reasoning Conspiracy
9-11 Pentagon missing $2.3 trillion Rumsfeld Exposed 9/10/2001 ... Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney ...Day Before 9/11: Rumsfeld says $2.3 Trillion Missing from ...
www.sott.net/.../234813-Day-Before-9-11-Rumsfeld-says-2-3-Trillion-M...
Sep 11, 2011 - Dov Zakheim and the Missing Trillions [Link]. Deciphering ... Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11 [Link]. Sun, 11 Sep ...Goon Squad: 9/11: About those missing Pentagon TRILLIONS
careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/.../911-about-those-missing-pen...
Jan 27, 2013 - According to Barrett, Rabbi Dov Zakheim is “one of the leading suspected hands-
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=16224
Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out a story that began: “Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.” According to this story, Olson reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.”2 Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.3
However, although Ted Olson’s report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined.
Olson’s Self-Contradictions
Olson began this process of undermining by means of self-contradictions. He first told CNN, as we have seen, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone.” But he contradicted this claim on September 14, telling Hannity and Colmes that she had reached him by calling the Department of Justice collect. Therefore, she must have been using the “airplane phone,” he surmised, because “she somehow didn’t have access to her credit cards.”4 However, this version of Olson’s story, besides contradicting his first version, was even self-contradictory, because a credit card is needed to activate a passenger-seat phone.
Later that same day, moreover, Olson told Larry King Live that the second call from his wife suddenly went dead because “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well.”5 After that return to his first version, he finally settled on the second version, saying that his wife had called collect and hence must have used “the phone in the passengers’ seats” because she did not have her purse.6
By finally settling on this story, Olson avoided a technological pitfall. Given the cell phone system employed in 2001, high-altitude cell phone calls from airliners were impossible, or at least virtually so (Olson’s statement that “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well” was a considerable understatement). The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004.7
However, Olson’s second story, besides being self-contradictory, was contradicted by American Airlines.
American Airlines Contradicts Olson’s Second Version
A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8
In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been contradicted by the FBI.
Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians
Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.11
According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”12 This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “[t]he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”13), and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.14 Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don't know what happened in that cockpit, but I'm sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”15
The Pentagon historians, in any case, did not accept the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”16
Conclusion
This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?
The fact that Ted Olson’s report has been contradicted by other defenders of the official story about 9/11 provides grounds for demanding a new investigation of 9/11. This internal contradiction is, moreover, only one of 25 such contradictions discussed in my most recent book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press.
However, although Ted Olson’s report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined.
Olson’s Self-Contradictions
Olson began this process of undermining by means of self-contradictions. He first told CNN, as we have seen, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone.” But he contradicted this claim on September 14, telling Hannity and Colmes that she had reached him by calling the Department of Justice collect. Therefore, she must have been using the “airplane phone,” he surmised, because “she somehow didn’t have access to her credit cards.”4 However, this version of Olson’s story, besides contradicting his first version, was even self-contradictory, because a credit card is needed to activate a passenger-seat phone.
Later that same day, moreover, Olson told Larry King Live that the second call from his wife suddenly went dead because “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well.”5 After that return to his first version, he finally settled on the second version, saying that his wife had called collect and hence must have used “the phone in the passengers’ seats” because she did not have her purse.6
By finally settling on this story, Olson avoided a technological pitfall. Given the cell phone system employed in 2001, high-altitude cell phone calls from airliners were impossible, or at least virtually so (Olson’s statement that “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well” was a considerable understatement). The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004.7
However, Olson’s second story, besides being self-contradictory, was contradicted by American Airlines.
American Airlines Contradicts Olson’s Second Version
A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8
In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been contradicted by the FBI.
Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
Olson’s Story Also Rejected by Pentagon Historians
Ted Olson’s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.11
According to Olson, his wife had said that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers.”12 This is an inherently implausible scenario. We are supposed to believe that 60-some people, including the two pilots, were held at bay by three or four men (one or two of the hijackers would have been in the cockpit) with knives and boxcutters. This scenario becomes even more absurd when we realize that the alleged hijackers were all small, unathletic men (the 9/11 Commission pointed out that even “[t]he so-called muscle hijackers actually were not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5” and 5’7” in height and slender in build”13), and that the pilot, Charles “Chic” Burlingame, was a weightlifter and a boxer, who was described as “really tough” by one of his erstwhile opponents.14 Also, the idea that Burlingame would have turned over the plane to hijackers was rejected by his brother, who said: “I don't know what happened in that cockpit, but I'm sure that they would have had to incapacitate him or kill him because he would have done anything to prevent the kind of tragedy that befell that airplane.”15
The Pentagon historians, in any case, did not accept the Olson story, according to which Burlingame and his co-pilot did give up their plane and were in the back with the passengers and other crew members. They instead wrote that “the attackers either incapacitated or murdered the two pilots.”16
Conclusion
This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?
The fact that Ted Olson’s report has been contradicted by other defenders of the official story about 9/11 provides grounds for demanding a new investigation of 9/11. This internal contradiction is, moreover, only one of 25 such contradictions discussed in my most recent book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press.
QUOTE
Barbara was a Texan, from a family whose ancestors came to this country from Germany. She went to the all-American University of Texas and also a Catholic college, St. Thomas in Houston. She became a professional ballet dancer in San Francisco and New York because of the beauty of dance, the rigor of its discipline, and because you have to be extraordinarily tough and ambitious to do it. And Barbara was extraordinarily tough and ambitious.
But she always wanted to be a lawyer and to be involved in politics. In order to afford law school, she invented a career out of whole cloth in Hollywood because that, she determined, was the fastest way to earn the money she needed. It did not matter in the slightest to Barbara that when she went to Hollywood she knew absolutely nothing about the motion picture and television industry. And, in fact, it really didn't matter because, as she later explained to the unwitting producer who gave her her first job, she was a fast-learner.
And, of course, she succeeded. She turned down the last job she was offered in Hollywood because she had finally earned enough money to go to law school, and they were offering her so much money she did not want to be so tempted to forego her dream to be a lawyer.
She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not necessarily the obvious choice for a blond Catholic girl from Texas. She was even told that she would never fit in, and that she would be miserable. But the people who told her that really did not know Barbara. She thrived at Cardozo as she had thrived at St. Thomas and in the ballet and in Hollywood. She loved the people, the classes, the professors, and she was a huge success, popping up for one reason or another with embarrassing frequency on the cover of Jewish Weekly.
Barbara created a Federalist Society chapter at Cardozo because she believed in the Society's principles - and it only served to goad her on that almost no one at Cardozo shared her political views.
In her third year of law school, she somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship with the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gusty intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country -- because they were terrorists. How Barbara loved to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!
http://www.fed-soc.org/resources/id.63/default.asp
But she always wanted to be a lawyer and to be involved in politics. In order to afford law school, she invented a career out of whole cloth in Hollywood because that, she determined, was the fastest way to earn the money she needed. It did not matter in the slightest to Barbara that when she went to Hollywood she knew absolutely nothing about the motion picture and television industry. And, in fact, it really didn't matter because, as she later explained to the unwitting producer who gave her her first job, she was a fast-learner.
And, of course, she succeeded. She turned down the last job she was offered in Hollywood because she had finally earned enough money to go to law school, and they were offering her so much money she did not want to be so tempted to forego her dream to be a lawyer.
She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not necessarily the obvious choice for a blond Catholic girl from Texas. She was even told that she would never fit in, and that she would be miserable. But the people who told her that really did not know Barbara. She thrived at Cardozo as she had thrived at St. Thomas and in the ballet and in Hollywood. She loved the people, the classes, the professors, and she was a huge success, popping up for one reason or another with embarrassing frequency on the cover of Jewish Weekly.
Barbara created a Federalist Society chapter at Cardozo because she believed in the Society's principles - and it only served to goad her on that almost no one at Cardozo shared her political views.
In her third year of law school, she somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship with the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gusty intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country -- because they were terrorists. How Barbara loved to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!
http://www.fed-soc.org/resources/id.63/default.asp
Dov Zakheim was an adjunct professor at Yeshiva University. IMHO - Barbara was a true believer who was recruited to play a key role in creating the 9/11 Myth. Who knows, maybe living with Ted was a front and she couldn't wait to start a new life and not have to play wifey to the old fart.
The more I think about this aspect of 9/11, the more bizarre it is. I mean, this (Ted) is the guy who went to bat for Dick Cheney so that he wouldn't be forced to hand over the minutes of his Energy Task Force meetings (the ones Kenneth Lay allegedly attended). We know that the whole phone call business was manufactured. Does anyone really believe that someone that close to Bush and Cheney, who lied to help define the 9/11 official story, didn't know Flight 77 and its passengers were doomed? Of course he did. That makes me wonder how she got chosen for the role. Did Ted volunteer her? Did he buy her ticket???
QUOTE
"Theodore Olson's wife, Barbara Olson, Calls From Flight 77 Married to the US Solicitor General Theodore Olson, a close aide and friend of President George W Bush, she was a prominent member of Washington's conservative elite; this group, which also included the Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas and the independent counsel Kenneth Starr, prompted Hillary Clinton to complain of a "vast right-wing conspiracy."
Below is an excerpt from a CNN story detailing an interview between Larry King and Theodore Olson regarding Barbara's phone call.
[King] Olson was one of the passengers on American Airlines Flight 77, which was "hijacked by terrorists and crashed into the Pentagon on September 11". But before she died inside the doomed airplane, Olson kept her cool and made two telephone calls to her husband.
"She wasn't crying, she didn't even sound frightened. She told me her plane was hijacked and that they didn't know she was making a phone call," Ted Olson told CNN's Larry King. Barbara Olson's last words to her husband, he said, were "What do I tell the pilot to do?" (cnn)
Below is excerpted from a detailed timeline developed at cooperativeresearch.org; this section details the communications.
(9:25 a.m.) A passenger on Flight 77, Barbara Olson, calls her husband, Theodore (Ted) Olson, who is Solicitor General at the Justice Department. Ted Olson is in his Justice Department office watching WTC news on television when his wife calls.
A few days later, he says, "She told me that she had been herded to the back of the plane. She mentioned that they had used knives and box cutters to hijack the plane. She mentioned that the pilot had announced that the plane had been hijacked." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] He tells her that two planes have hit the WTC. [Telegraph, 3/5/02] She feels nobody is taking charge.[CNN, 9/12/01] He doesn't know if she was near the pilots, but at one point she asks, "What shall I tell the pilot? What can I tell the pilot to do?" [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Then she gets cut off without warning. [Newsweek, 9/29/01]
Ted Olson' recollection of the call's timing is extremely vague, saying it "must have been 9:15 or 9:30. Someone would have to reconstruct the time for me." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Other accounts place it around 9:25. [About 9:25, Miami Herald, 9/14/01, about 9:25, New York Times, 9/15/01 ©, "by 9:25," Washington Post, 9/21/01] The call is said to have lasted about a minute. [Washington Post, 9/12/01 ( B) ] By some accounts, his warning that planes have hit the WTC comes later in a second phone call (see (After 9:30 a.m.)). [Washington Post, 9/21/01] In one account, Barbara Olson calls from inside a bathroom. [Evening Standard, 9/12/01] In another account, she is near a pilot, and in yet another she is near two pilots. [Boston Globe, 11/23/01]
Ted Olson's account of how the call is made is also strange and conflicting. Three days after 9/11, he says, "I found out later that she was having, for some reason, to call collect and was having trouble getting through. You know how it is to get through to a government institution when you're calling collect." He says he doesn't know what kind of phone she used, but he has "assumed that it must have been on the airplane phone, and that she somehow didn't have access to her credit cards. Otherwise, she would have used her cell phone and called me." [Fox News, 9/14/01]
But in another interview on the same day, he says that she used a cell phone and that she may have gotten cut off "because the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don't work that well." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Six months later, he claims she called collect "using the phone in the passengers' seats." [Telegraph, 3/5/02]
But it isn't possible to call on seatback phones without a credit card, which would render making a collect call moot. Many other details are conflicting, and Olson faults his memory and says that he "tends to mix the two [calls] up because of the emotion of the events." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©]
Some have questioned if Ted Olson can be trusted in his account of the call, since he has stated that lying to the public is justifiable. [Sydney Morning Herald, 3/20/02] Between his memory and his approval of lying for partisan ends, can Ted Olson's account be trusted?
This is the only call from Flight 77, and the only call to mention box cutters.
Below is an excerpt from a CNN story detailing an interview between Larry King and Theodore Olson regarding Barbara's phone call.
[King] Olson was one of the passengers on American Airlines Flight 77, which was "hijacked by terrorists and crashed into the Pentagon on September 11". But before she died inside the doomed airplane, Olson kept her cool and made two telephone calls to her husband.
"She wasn't crying, she didn't even sound frightened. She told me her plane was hijacked and that they didn't know she was making a phone call," Ted Olson told CNN's Larry King. Barbara Olson's last words to her husband, he said, were "What do I tell the pilot to do?" (cnn)
Below is excerpted from a detailed timeline developed at cooperativeresearch.org; this section details the communications.
(9:25 a.m.) A passenger on Flight 77, Barbara Olson, calls her husband, Theodore (Ted) Olson, who is Solicitor General at the Justice Department. Ted Olson is in his Justice Department office watching WTC news on television when his wife calls.
A few days later, he says, "She told me that she had been herded to the back of the plane. She mentioned that they had used knives and box cutters to hijack the plane. She mentioned that the pilot had announced that the plane had been hijacked." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] He tells her that two planes have hit the WTC. [Telegraph, 3/5/02] She feels nobody is taking charge.[CNN, 9/12/01] He doesn't know if she was near the pilots, but at one point she asks, "What shall I tell the pilot? What can I tell the pilot to do?" [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Then she gets cut off without warning. [Newsweek, 9/29/01]
Ted Olson' recollection of the call's timing is extremely vague, saying it "must have been 9:15 or 9:30. Someone would have to reconstruct the time for me." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Other accounts place it around 9:25. [About 9:25, Miami Herald, 9/14/01, about 9:25, New York Times, 9/15/01 ©, "by 9:25," Washington Post, 9/21/01] The call is said to have lasted about a minute. [Washington Post, 9/12/01 ( B) ] By some accounts, his warning that planes have hit the WTC comes later in a second phone call (see (After 9:30 a.m.)). [Washington Post, 9/21/01] In one account, Barbara Olson calls from inside a bathroom. [Evening Standard, 9/12/01] In another account, she is near a pilot, and in yet another she is near two pilots. [Boston Globe, 11/23/01]
Ted Olson's account of how the call is made is also strange and conflicting. Three days after 9/11, he says, "I found out later that she was having, for some reason, to call collect and was having trouble getting through. You know how it is to get through to a government institution when you're calling collect." He says he doesn't know what kind of phone she used, but he has "assumed that it must have been on the airplane phone, and that she somehow didn't have access to her credit cards. Otherwise, she would have used her cell phone and called me." [Fox News, 9/14/01]
But in another interview on the same day, he says that she used a cell phone and that she may have gotten cut off "because the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don't work that well." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©] Six months later, he claims she called collect "using the phone in the passengers' seats." [Telegraph, 3/5/02]
But it isn't possible to call on seatback phones without a credit card, which would render making a collect call moot. Many other details are conflicting, and Olson faults his memory and says that he "tends to mix the two [calls] up because of the emotion of the events." [CNN, 9/14/01 ©]
Some have questioned if Ted Olson can be trusted in his account of the call, since he has stated that lying to the public is justifiable. [Sydney Morning Herald, 3/20/02] Between his memory and his approval of lying for partisan ends, can Ted Olson's account be trusted?
This is the only call from Flight 77, and the only call to mention box cutters.
Day Before 9/11: Rumsfeld says $2.3 Trillion Missing from ...
www.sott.net/.../234813-Day-Before-9-11-Rumsfeld-says-2-3-Trillion-M...
Sep 11, 2011 - Dov Zakheim and the Missing Trillions [Link]. Deciphering ... Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11 [Link]. Sun, 11 Sep ...
www.sott.net/.../234813-Day-Before-9-11-Rumsfeld-says-2-3-Trillion-M...
Sep 11, 2011 - Dov Zakheim and the Missing Trillions [Link]. Deciphering ... Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11 [Link]. Sun, 11 Sep ...Goon Squad: 9/11: About those missing Pentagon TRILLIONS
careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/.../911-about-those-missing-pen...
Jan 27, 2013 - According to Barrett, Rabbi Dov Zakheim is “one of the leading suspected hands-
careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/.../911-about-those-missing-pen...
Jan 27, 2013 - According to Barrett, Rabbi Dov Zakheim is “one of the leading suspected hands-
Pentagon Frets Over Wasted Billions (Ignores Missing ...
https://www.corbettreport.com/pentagon-frets-over-wasted-billions-ignor...
Sep 2, 2011 - Pentagon Frets Over Wasted Billions (Ignores Missing Trillions) ... since the false flag terrorist incident of 9/11, however, the report makes the case ... members as Dov Zakheim, the comptroller of the Pentagon under the first George ... Prior to taking over the Pentagon's finances, Zakheim was an executive at ...
https://www.corbettreport.com/pentagon-frets-over-wasted-billions-ignor...
Sep 2, 2011 - Pentagon Frets Over Wasted Billions (Ignores Missing Trillions) ... since the false flag terrorist incident of 9/11, however, the report makes the case ... members as Dov Zakheim, the comptroller of the Pentagon under the first George ... Prior to taking over the Pentagon's finances, Zakheim was an executive at ...DOV ZAKHEIM | Ken Doc - INVESTIGATE 9/11
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-co-conspirators/dov-zakheim/
9/11 Mastermind Dov Zakheim: www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXLmAiNYRoE ... DOV ZAKHEIM – Pentagon comptroller when trillions of dollars were reported ...
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-co-conspirators/dov-zakheim/
9/11 Mastermind Dov Zakheim: www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXLmAiNYRoE ... DOV ZAKHEIM – Pentagon comptroller when trillions of dollars were reported ...9-11 Pentagon missing $2.3 trillion Rumsfeld Exposed 9/10 ...
Barbara Olson (ted Olson) Research - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=16224
Feb 1, 2009 - 17 posts - 9 authors
"Theodore Olson's wife, Barbara Olson, Calls From Flight 77 Married to ... TheodoreOlson, a close aide and friend of President George W Bush, she ..... She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not ...Point PC-2: The Reported Phone Calls from Barbara Olson ...
www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/
This would have been roughly a half hour before this plane, according to the official ... Ted Olson reported, according to CNN, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell ... The 9/11 Commission Report stated (in 2004) that the FBI and the ... With regard to the possibility that Barbara Olson had used a cell phone, the FBI ...
Missing: yeshiva
Point PC-2: The Reported Phone Calls from Barbara Olson
Americans were first told that terrorists had hijacked an airliner when CNN gave a report about US Solicitor General Theodore “Ted” Olson, who said that his wife, well-known TV commentator Barbara Olson, had called him twice from American Airlines (AA) Flight 77, stating that terrorists had taken over this flight. This would have been roughly a half hour before this plane, according to the official story, crashed into the Pentagon.
Ted Olson reported, according to CNN, that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers,” who had “knives and cardboard cutters.” [1]
Although Olson had originally told CNN that his wife had used a cell phone, the FBI’s September 11th summary of its interview of him said: “[Mr. Olson] doesn’t know if the calls were made from [Barbara Olson’s] cell phone or the telephone on the plane.” [2] But during a September 14 interview on Hannity & Colmes, Olson suggested that his wife had reached him at the Department of Justice by using the “airplane phone.” [3] Ted Olson continued to go back and forth between the two alternatives. [4]
In any case, the first call from his wife, Olson told the FBI, lasted “about one minute.” [5] The second call, he told Larry King, lasted “two or three or four minutes.” [6]
The 9/11 Commission Report stated (in 2004) that the FBI and the Department of Justice believed that there had actually been four calls from Barbara Olson. [7]
The story about Barbara Olson’s report of the hijacking of AA 77 was foundational for the official account of 9/11. This foundational role is illustrated by the fact that, although it has been widely held that the hijackers had box cutters, this idea was provided only by Ted Olson’s report of his wife’s phone calls. In any case, in spite of the foundational role of the Olson story, there were three serious problems with its credibility:
- One problem is that, although Ted Olson went back and forth on whether his wife had used an onboard phone or a cell phone, she evidently could not have used either:
- With regard to the possibility that Barbara Olson had used a cell phone, the FBI ruled this out in 2004, saying: “All of the calls from Flight 77 were made via the onboard airphone system.” [8]
- There is also evidence that Barbara Olson could not have made the calls attributed to her in The 9/11 Commission Report: This is the evidence, cited in the Burnett section of Point PC-4: “Cell Phone Calls from the Planes: The Second Official Account”, that the cell phone technology available in 2001 would not have allowed cell phone calls from this airliner. [9]
- Further evidence that Barbara Olson could not have used an onboard phone to call from AA 77 is provided by a page in the Boeing 757 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (757 AMM), dated January 28, 2001. The first sentence of this page states: “The passenger telephone system was deactivated by ECO FO878.” (ECO F1463 and F1532 were later orders to remove the phones.) This page indicates, in other words, that by January 28, 2001, the passenger phone system for the AA 757 fleet had been deactivated. [10]
- The impossibility of Olson’s having used an onboard phone is further supported by a pilot and a flight attendant:
- After being a fighter pilot, and having attended the US Navy Fighter Weapons School, Captain Ralph Kolstad served as an airline pilot for 27 years, during 13 of which he flew Boeing 757s and 767s for American Airlines. He wrote: “[T]he ‘air phones,’ as they were called, were … deactivated in early or mid 2001. They had been deactivated for quite some time prior to Sep 2001.” [11]
- Flight attendant Ginger Gainer, after reporting that the Boeing 757s prepared for international flights had stickers on the seatback phones “indicating that they were inoperative,” added: “I asked several current and former Flight Attendants for American … who flew domestic … and they all said that they recalled the phones as having been disabled at the time, or gone.” [12]
- There is one more reason to be skeptical about the claim that Barbara and Ted Olson talked that morning by telephone: Neither the telephone company records, nor the Department of Justice phone call records, nor Barbara Olson’s cell phone call records have ever been made public, in spite of the fact that there has been much discussion of the authenticity of the reported phone calls from her. [13]
- A second more serious problem is that the Olson story was contradicted in the FBI’s 2006 report to the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui. In its report about phone calls from AA 77, the FBI stated that there was one call from Barbara Olson (not two), and that this call was “unconnected,” so that it lasted “0 seconds.” [14] This report thereby contradicted Ted Olson’s report that his wife had made two calls to him, one that lasted “about one minute” and another that lasted “two or three or four minutes.” [15]
- A third problem is that Barbara Olson’s story as told by her husband is simply implausible. According to this story, 60 passengers – including pilot Charles “Chic” Burlingame, a former Navy pilot who was a weightlifter and a boxer [16] – were held off in the back of the plane by three or four hijackers (one or two would have been in the pilot’s cabin). And yet these alleged hijackers were, as a 9/11 Commission staff document mentioned, “not physically imposing, as the majority of them were between 5’5″ and 5’7″ in height and slender in build.” [17] If these small men were armed only with knives and box cutters, the pilots and the male passengers could have easily overpowered them.
Conclusion
Although Ted Olson reported two calls from his wife and the 9/11 Commission attributed four calls to her, the best evidence shows three problems in the official account. These problems, taken in reverse order, lead to this threefold conclusion:
- Barbara Olson’s account of what occurred on AA 77, as told by her husband, is implausible.
- The FBI’s report on phone calls from AA 77 indicates that she did not reach her husband from that flight.
- Various accounts indicate that she could not have called her husband from AA 77. [18]
.............................
http://www.rense.com/general75/latest.htm
And The Missing $2.3 Trillion
3-28-7
|
..........................
The Mother of All Lies About 9/11 - Barbara Olson's "Phone ...
whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/mother_lies_911.html
Mar 27, 2002 - Though at the time the little white lie was flagged with a powerful political name, ... “Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight ... and the second is on December 12, about President Bush, who led a White ...
Missing: yeshiva
9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europe - Before ...
beforeitsnews.com/9-11.../9-11-crash-victim-barbara-olson-arrested-in-e...
Nov 18, 2010 - Ted Olson is the former Bush 43 Solicitor General who had ... That woman died on the plane that was thrown into the Pentagon and to ... died on 9-11) side-by-Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls ...
911blogger.com/node/9627
Jun 26, 2007 - 06/26/07 - Did American Airlines 77---the flight that, according to the official conspiracy theory about 9/11, struck .... George H.W. Bush, 9/11/91.BARBARA OLSON - 9/11 FRAUD? Is Lady Booth Really Barbara Olson ...
letsrollforums.com › ... › The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93
Jun 21, 2011 - 10 posts - 3 authors
The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93. ... Family Son of Lester W. & Yvonne BevryOlson; 2 children; Married Lady Booth, October 21, 2006. ... Yeshiva University opened the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in 1976. .... In addition to Starr andOlson, its Legal Advisory Council includes George Bush's ...BARBARA OLSON - 9/11 FRAUD? Is Lady Booth Really Barbara Olson ...
letsrollforums.com › ... › The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93
Feb 25, 2011 - The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93. ... This is downright weird: TedOlson's first 3 wives died. ... says cheese with the late Barbara K. Olson at a Bushfamily fete thrown ..... After graduating from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law atYeshiva University in Manhattan, she went to Washington, where ...The Femme Fatales of 9/11
www.combatreform.org/tedandbarbaradid911.htm
This makes both Olsons and Bush ACCESSORIES BEFORE THE FACT in the ... Story of not taking an earlier flight to be either with Ted for his birthday the night .... Once you realize Ted Olson did not talk to his wife Barbara on any airliner but lied ...... She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, notAmerican Action Report: What Happened to Flight 77's ...
americanactionreport.blogspot.com/.../what-happened-to-flight-77s-pass...
Jul 7, 2010 - In the minds of most Americans, the results of 9/11 are beyond question. .... Ted was a solicitor general appointed by George W. Bush after Olson had successfully ... who was among the wedding guests when he married Lady Evelyn Booth. .... How do Barbara's Law shool photos from Yeshiva University's .......................
Barbara Olson (ted Olson) Research - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=16224
Feb 1, 2009 - 17 posts - 9 authors
"Theodore Olson's wife, Barbara Olson, Calls From Flight 77 Married to ... TheodoreOlson, a close aide and friend of President George W Bush, she ..... She turned down the last job she was offered in Hollywood because she had ... She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not ...9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europe - Before ...
beforeitsnews.com/9-11.../9-11-crash-victim-barbara-olson-arrested-in-e...
Nov 18, 2010 - Ted Olson is the former Bush 43 Solicitor General who had previously ... That woman died on the plane that was thrown into the Pentagon and to ... died on 9-BARBARA OLSON - 9/11 FRAUD? Is Lady Booth Really Barbara Olson ...
letsrollforums.com › ... › The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93
Jun 21, 2011 - 10 posts - 3 authors
The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93. ... Family Son of Lester W. & Yvonne BevryOlson; 2 children; Married Lady Booth, October 21, 2006. ... after successful ventures as a ballet dancer and a Hollywood production manager. ... Yeshiva University opened the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in 1976.The Femme Fatales of 9/11
www.combatreform.org/tedandbarbaradid911.htm
This makes both Olsons and Bush ACCESSORIES BEFORE THE FACT in the ... Story of not taking an earlier flight to be either with Ted for his birthday the night .... Once you realize Ted Olson did not talk to his wife Barbara on any airliner but lied ...... withmarriage and the family - especially in conventional Hollywood filmsFBI: Barbara Olsen DID NOT CALL Ted Olsen. Bush Solicitor General ...
forum.prisonplanet.com › ... › 9/11 Material & Research › WTC 1 & 2
Feb 21, 2008 - 25 posts - 12 authors
BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen. .... Though at the time the little white lie was flagged with a powerful political ... Ted Olson told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel, ...... went to Hollywood, she just went there to raise money go to law school.
Missing: yeshiva
American Action Report: What Happened to Flight 77's ...
americanactionreport.blogspot.com/.../what-happened-to-flight-77s-pass...
Jul 7, 2010 - In the minds of most Americans, the results of 9/11 are beyond question. ... Secondly, Flight 77 supposedly crashed into the Pentagon. ... Ted was a solicitor general appointed by George W. Bush after Olson had successfully argued ... was among the wedding guests when he married Lady Evelyn Booth.Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls ...
911blogger.com/node/9627
Jun 26, 2007 - 06/26/07 - Did American Airlines 77---the flight that, according to the official conspiracy ... General, claimed that his wife, Barbara Olson, called him twice from this flight using an onboard phone. .... George H.W. Bush, 9/11/91 ..... from the Benjamin Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York.
Missing: hollywood
Barbara Olson - Brock911 Wiki - Wikia
brock911.wikia.com/wiki/Barbara_Olson
She switched careers and went to Hollywood to work as an assistant producer ... He went on to successfully represent presidential candidate George W. Bush in the ... (9:20 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Barbara Olson Said to Call from Flight 77, but ... of the attacks on the World Trade Center on television when his wife calls.A Tribute to Barbara Olson, Fallen Heroine - Free Republic
www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/546840/posts
Oct 12, 2001 - Mrs. Olson, wife of U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, was killed on ... President Bush, whose case Mr. Olson argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last .... (It was on the plane with her; I didn't expect it to, but sometimes -- as irrational .... she moved to Hollywood and began telephoning production companies ...
Free Republic
No comments:
Post a Comment