British Comedian Donates to Guantanamo Prisoner Slandered and Worse by CIA,MI6 Since 2001
Guantanamo Cocaine Trafficking,CIA,DEA Michele Leonhart,Russian Jewish Mafia,Hillary Clinton,DEA Michele Leonhart,Colombia President Álvaro Uribe Vélez ,4 Mexico Generals and Venezuela President Hugo Chavez
Obviously just the quote below from the U.S. and Israeli propaganda agency CNN ,even with its strong anti-Chavez bias,couldn't deny the obvious truth about Venezuelan judge who was working for the U.S.to try once again to set Hugo Chavez up on false drug trafficking accusations just as they have been particularly trying to do so with the very DC-9 of the Florida penny stock fraud Skyway Communications with its CIA and Israaeli,(Israeli-American attorney Micheal Farkas incorporated it),and criminal Titan Corp connections that even DEA Chief Michele Leonhart is linked to !
http://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.com/2012/08/guantanamo-cocaine-traffickingciarussia.html
Frankie Boyle donates £50,000 to a prisoner in Guantanamo Guantanamo to sue MI6
He’s
the television comedian best known for controversial jokes about
swimmer Rebecca Adlington, The Queen and people with Down’s syndrome.
But
Frankie Boyle is now using his fame, and wealth, for more serious ends,
by donating tens of thousands of pounds of his money to help Britain’s
last inmate at Guantanamo Bay to sue the MI6.
Yesterday
the Glaswegian comic announced the £50,000 compensation he won from a
recent libel victory against the Daily Mirror newspaper, would go
towards a landmark legal attempt to sue Britain’s security services over
accusations they have defamed Shaker Aamer, the only British resident
still languishing without charge in Guantanamo.
Boyle,
who has decided to retire from comedy early next year after repeated
clashes over his controversial style of humour, unveiled his plan
alongside Reprieve, the British-American charity which has long
represented inmates of Washington’s extra-judicial jail.
Even
Boyle, who is best known for his performances on BBC panel show Mock
the Week, admits his involvement in the case sounds a little
far-fetched. “I remember reading [the US pop star] Usher crashed a hot
air balloon into something, and I thought ‘this is just a random word
generator’”, he told The Independent yesterday. “It feels a bit like
that.”
Clive Stafford-Smith, the
director of Reprieve, admitted the libel action untested legal formula
but said there was important legal ground that needed to be explored.
“If the Daily Mirror says something bad about Frankie that embarrasses
him or humiliates him then he has the right to sue,” he said.
“If,
on the other hand, a far more powerful organisation, the British
government and their agents, say something about Shaker – whereby
instead of being humiliated he’s banged up in prison for eleven years
for something he patently didn’t do and something he’s never been
charged with – then the British government’s position is Shaker can
do nothing.”
Aamer was arrested in
Afghanistan in late 2001 and is the only British resident left in
Guantanamo, a US detention centre in Cuba. He has been cleared for
release by the US authorities but has yet to be freed as the Americans
have insisted on returning him to Saudi Arabia. Although he holds Saudi
nationality with his British residency, Aamer’s wife and four children –
one of whom he has never met – live in London. The British government
are supportive of him returning to the UK but the Americans have so far
refused to hand him over.
A
Foreign Office spokesperson said they could not comment on any on-going
legal proceedings but Reprieve claim that they have already seen a
response from Government lawyers claiming the security services are
protected by legal privilege.
“The
claim they would make is they would have law enforcement privilege,”
said Stafford-Smith. “But our response to that is they’re not enforcing
any law because Shaker has not broken any law, he’s not been prosecuted
for breaking any law and they’re not investigating him for breaking any
law. So our position is they would have no such privilege.”
No comments:
Post a Comment